IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: New gun, booze laws make no sense

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Happy New Year!

It’s that time of year when cocktails flow, parties proliferate and celebratory fireworks wake the kids.

OK, so it’s just the fiscal new year and the recent festivities probably have more to do with the Fourth of July than with the shiny promise of the next 12 months, but state lawmakers nevertheless have been kind enough to provide some resolutions—in the form of laws that took effect July 1.

Thing is, we can’t blow these resolutions off after a couple of weeks (or days), no matter how much we want to. And there are a couple we really want to blow off.

That’s probably not a good choice of words when referring to the most egregious new law, a measure we have opposed since it was just a bad bill floating around the General Assembly: Businesses no longer can prohibit their employees from bringing firearms to work. Sure, gun owners must leave their weapons locked in their vehicles, but that’s still a bad idea.

Employers should be ableto set their own rules for what happens on company property—and establish whatever policies they think are necessary to ensure worker safety, including banning firearms.

Emotions can run high during a tough day at the office—especially in a tough economy as workers are asked to do more with less—and having guns as close as a quick walk to the parking lot is just asking for trouble.

Officials at steelmaker ArcelorMittal USA, in fact, already have told workers at its mills in northwestern Indiana to leave their guns at home despite the state’s OK. And as IBJ.com reported July 1, the Indiana Chamber of Commerce is talking to at least a dozen companies about mounting a legal challenge to the law. We wish them luck.

And our second entry from the “What Were They Thinking?” department: Alcoholic beverage retailers now are required to check a photo ID for anyone purchasing alcohol. Yep, anyone.

So if Granny wants to buy that bottle of wine for Sunday dinner, she’s going to have to dig out the driver’s license that probably hasn’t seen the light of day since her last trip to the BMV. Seriously, folks?

The law is intended to cut down on the sale of alcohol to minors, but we just don’t see how sweeping obviously of-age folks into the dragnet is going to help. Let’s get real: Clerks should be checking IDs of anyone who looks anywhere close to 21, and those of us who are lucky enough to be asked to prove our age decades after our first legal drink can take that as a compliment. But now it’s just going to be a pain.

Another new law is right on the money: Microbreweries now are allowed to sell their products for carryout on Sundays, something farm wineries have been able to do for years. We’ll raise a glass to that decision—if we can find our IDs.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to edit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.

ADVERTISEMENT