IBJNews

Education dominates Daniels' State of State address

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels urged Indiana lawmakers Tuesday night to be aggressive in making sweeping changes to the state's education system, including a broad expansion of charter schools and limits on teacher union contracts.

Daniels used about half of his 30-minute State of the State speech to promote his education proposals, saying he believed there was no time for delay.

"We have waited long enough for an education system known for excellence in teaching, and accountable schools that deliver the results our kids deserve," he told a House chamber packed with lawmakers and others. "Our parents have waited long enough for the freedom to decide which school is best for their children. We cannot 'almost' end the waiting."

Top Democrats in the Legislature, however, said Daniels misplaced priorities in his speech by not talking more about job creation at a time when the state has an unemployment rate of nearly 10 percent.

The governor's education proposals include providing vouchers that would help some parents pay for their children to go to private schools. Opponents say vouchers would undercut public schools and blur the line between separation of church and state, but they've been supported by the governor's fellow Republicans who now control both houses of the General Assembly.

Daniels has been mentioned for months as a potential 2012 presidential candidate, but his speech didn't include any apparent White House references, and he has said he won't make any political announcements until after the Legislature wraps up its session in late April.

Daniels has said he's excited about the prospect of Indiana becoming a leader in education. If he can get his massive education agenda passed, it also would boost his reputation nationally, said Ray Scheele, co-director of the Bowen Center for Public Affairs at Ball State University.

"One of the major underpinnings of any governor running for president is what has that governor done for education in his or her state," Scheele said. "This is a chance for Gov. Daniels to really make his mark with a reform proposal for public education."

Daniels invited some children who were awaiting a spot in a private or charter school and their parents to attend Tuesday's speech, using them as an example of what he says is the need for greater school options.

"These children, and their parents, have waited long enough for a better chance in life," Daniels said.

Daniels, however, didn't give details on who would be eligible for the vouchers, although his administration says the plan is meant not to cost the state any more money.

He also took aim at teacher union contracts that he says go too far in setting rules beyond teacher pay and benefits.

"We must free our school leaders from all the handcuffs that reduce their ability to meet the higher expectations we now have for student achievement."

House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said he believed Daniels should have spent more time discussing the state's unemployment problems and that the Legislature should make that its top priority, given that the state has nearly 300,000 people out of work.

"They've got to recognize the problem that we don't have jobs," he said.

More than $450 million in state funding for public schools has been among spending cuts ordered by Daniels to keep the two-year budget passed in 2009 in the black.

Democrats can support some of the governor's education proposals, but the biggest problem is the state's inability to fund public schools, said Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Bloomington.

"Education reform starts with adequate funding," she said. "That means you have to put Hoosiers back to work and we have to make sure they're working at a livable wage."

The governor also renewed his call for the elimination of township government, a proposal lawmakers have rebuffed the past two years.

Daniels said lawmakers should eliminate the more than 1,000 township governments around the state and change the current three-member county board of commissioner system to a single elected county executive.

Beyond saying he wouldn't support tax increases, Daniels gave few specifics during his speech about the state budget lawmakers will craft this session. Indiana is in better financial shape than many other states, but Daniels has had to cut millions from state agencies and education.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Complaining
    I bet if Daniels focused his SOTS speech on jobs, Bauer would complain that he didn't spend enough time talking about education. I tire of the rhetoric.
  • Call it what it is...
    I wish someone would challenge Daniels and call his vouchers proposal what it really is: A way for him to reward his financial supporters who are sending their children to private schools. He can claim he's trying to help low-income parents get a better education for their children but in fact the program can't be offered to one select group without a court challenge from the others. Consequently, the vouchers program would have to be available to everyone ... even the high-income.

    Indianapolis is fortunate to have many quality public schools that teach our children necessary academic lessons as well as how to exist in a very diverse society. Say what you will but the private schools by their nature, can't offer the same social lessons.

    A former co-worker who chose to homeschool his children was put off that some of his tax money went to fund schools that he didn't use yet was boasting about the government program that allowed him to buy a home. As I pointed out, that was a program I didn't use but as an American, I had a responsibility to pay taxes to help fund it. Welcome to America, where we have a responsibility to shore up our public schools so they are the best they can be. Personally, I'd rather my tax dollars went to public schools instead of prisons, which is where many of these students are destined to reside if we don't see the need to adequately fund and improve public education.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT