IBJNews

Education dominates Daniels' State of State address

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels urged Indiana lawmakers Tuesday night to be aggressive in making sweeping changes to the state's education system, including a broad expansion of charter schools and limits on teacher union contracts.

Daniels used about half of his 30-minute State of the State speech to promote his education proposals, saying he believed there was no time for delay.

"We have waited long enough for an education system known for excellence in teaching, and accountable schools that deliver the results our kids deserve," he told a House chamber packed with lawmakers and others. "Our parents have waited long enough for the freedom to decide which school is best for their children. We cannot 'almost' end the waiting."

Top Democrats in the Legislature, however, said Daniels misplaced priorities in his speech by not talking more about job creation at a time when the state has an unemployment rate of nearly 10 percent.

The governor's education proposals include providing vouchers that would help some parents pay for their children to go to private schools. Opponents say vouchers would undercut public schools and blur the line between separation of church and state, but they've been supported by the governor's fellow Republicans who now control both houses of the General Assembly.

Daniels has been mentioned for months as a potential 2012 presidential candidate, but his speech didn't include any apparent White House references, and he has said he won't make any political announcements until after the Legislature wraps up its session in late April.

Daniels has said he's excited about the prospect of Indiana becoming a leader in education. If he can get his massive education agenda passed, it also would boost his reputation nationally, said Ray Scheele, co-director of the Bowen Center for Public Affairs at Ball State University.

"One of the major underpinnings of any governor running for president is what has that governor done for education in his or her state," Scheele said. "This is a chance for Gov. Daniels to really make his mark with a reform proposal for public education."

Daniels invited some children who were awaiting a spot in a private or charter school and their parents to attend Tuesday's speech, using them as an example of what he says is the need for greater school options.

"These children, and their parents, have waited long enough for a better chance in life," Daniels said.

Daniels, however, didn't give details on who would be eligible for the vouchers, although his administration says the plan is meant not to cost the state any more money.

He also took aim at teacher union contracts that he says go too far in setting rules beyond teacher pay and benefits.

"We must free our school leaders from all the handcuffs that reduce their ability to meet the higher expectations we now have for student achievement."

House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said he believed Daniels should have spent more time discussing the state's unemployment problems and that the Legislature should make that its top priority, given that the state has nearly 300,000 people out of work.

"They've got to recognize the problem that we don't have jobs," he said.

More than $450 million in state funding for public schools has been among spending cuts ordered by Daniels to keep the two-year budget passed in 2009 in the black.

Democrats can support some of the governor's education proposals, but the biggest problem is the state's inability to fund public schools, said Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Bloomington.

"Education reform starts with adequate funding," she said. "That means you have to put Hoosiers back to work and we have to make sure they're working at a livable wage."

The governor also renewed his call for the elimination of township government, a proposal lawmakers have rebuffed the past two years.

Daniels said lawmakers should eliminate the more than 1,000 township governments around the state and change the current three-member county board of commissioner system to a single elected county executive.

Beyond saying he wouldn't support tax increases, Daniels gave few specifics during his speech about the state budget lawmakers will craft this session. Indiana is in better financial shape than many other states, but Daniels has had to cut millions from state agencies and education.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Complaining
    I bet if Daniels focused his SOTS speech on jobs, Bauer would complain that he didn't spend enough time talking about education. I tire of the rhetoric.
  • Call it what it is...
    I wish someone would challenge Daniels and call his vouchers proposal what it really is: A way for him to reward his financial supporters who are sending their children to private schools. He can claim he's trying to help low-income parents get a better education for their children but in fact the program can't be offered to one select group without a court challenge from the others. Consequently, the vouchers program would have to be available to everyone ... even the high-income.

    Indianapolis is fortunate to have many quality public schools that teach our children necessary academic lessons as well as how to exist in a very diverse society. Say what you will but the private schools by their nature, can't offer the same social lessons.

    A former co-worker who chose to homeschool his children was put off that some of his tax money went to fund schools that he didn't use yet was boasting about the government program that allowed him to buy a home. As I pointed out, that was a program I didn't use but as an American, I had a responsibility to pay taxes to help fund it. Welcome to America, where we have a responsibility to shore up our public schools so they are the best they can be. Personally, I'd rather my tax dollars went to public schools instead of prisons, which is where many of these students are destined to reside if we don't see the need to adequately fund and improve public education.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT