IBJNews

EEOC: Local bar fired worker over pregnancy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is suing the owner of a Broad Ripple bar, charging that it terminated a female employee because of her pregnancy.

The complaint against WBS Broad Ripple Inc., which does business as Wild Beaver Saloon, was filed by the EEOC on behalf of Heather Gibson, a former bartender and server. Her alleged firing due to a pregnancy violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the lawsuit asserts.

The suit also charges that the bar owner failed to post certain provisions of the act at the workplace, another violation of federal law.

EEOC filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court in Indianapolis on March 16. It is asking the court to grant a permanent injunction prohibiting the bar owner from terminating an employee because of her gender and pregnancy, or any other discrimination based on gender.

The complaint also requests that the bar owner institute policies and programs that provide equal employment opportunities for women.

In addition, it wants the bar owner to compensate Gibson for back pay and any future financial losses resulting from the termination, as well as punitive damages for its “malicious and reckless conduct,” to be determined at trial.

“Employees who become pregnant should not lose their jobs because of their condition,” said Laurie A. Young, regional attorney of the EEOC's Indianapolis District Office, in a prepared statement issued Monday. "The Commission will vigorously prosecute employers who engage in pregnancy discrimination or other forms of sex discrimination.”

The Wild Beaver Saloon in Broad Ripple is located at 723 Broad Ripple Ave. Another Wild Beaver is located in downtown Indianapolis at 20 E. Maryland St. The Indianapolis-based chain also has locations in Nashville, Tenn., and Lansing, Mich.

A phone call placed to the bar was not answered and an e-mail sent to company co-owner Richard Payne was not returned Tuesday afternoon.


 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • EEOC Information
    Rev. Michael Marine - The information at this web page should give you some options for what to do. - http://www.eeoc.gov/employees/howtofile.cfm
  • More Information is need before Judgement.
    I am mother to a wonderful child and as much as I agree with the law for not firing a pregnant woman. I am also smart enough to realize that anyone can claim that this is the reason for termination. For instance she could have been lets say late to work, not following rules and just because the law is in her favor, no one can fire her? This might not be the case, although all I know is a lot of people are trying to take advantage of lawsuits, mainly because its free to try and it only costs them if they win. The company I work for got sued by a woman for not getting pleasured by her husband, because he hurt his leg and they won. Its ridiculous, I wish we lived in a world where people who deserve to win lawsuits win and no one lies just to make a quick dollar. The saddest part is some of these "fake" lawsuits ruin good company's and in turn make other people loss their jobs.
  • Dan is wrong . . .
    Dan is wrong if he thinks this proves people don't need unions. I work for a federal agency that protects workers rights. Our agencies are totally understaffed to address more than a handful of the violations of labor and employment laws that take place all the time in this country. Don't ever give up your rights to collective bargaining and collective self defense in the workplace. There's no substitute for a union organization based right in the workplace.
  • Think about it
    Shelly -- If you think about it, this is further proof that unions are unnecessary. First, she's protected by Federal law. Second, she's got an EEOC lawyer who is an expert in her type of case. Third, that lawyer is a Federal Government employee, so she doesn't have to pay attorney fees or court costs. Finally, if she proves her case, she's will not only recover back pay and interest, she could win money damages. All without paying a penny in union dues!
    • other reason
      like not wanting to have to pay for health insurance to cover her hospital stay for the delivery of her baby? guess who is going to pay for that now?
    • Proof
      One question...how can she prove it was because of her pregnancy and not something else that could be a legitimate reason for the firing.
      • Firing for Going to Funeral
        Joe & Thomas,

        The law would allow an employer to fire an employee who went to a funeral. The law doesn't allow someone to be fired for a medical condition though like pregnancy
      • Call me crazy, but...
        If you're pregnant, maybe you shouldn't be working in a smoke filled bar.

        It's probably not good for your baby...
      • What to do
        my friend was also fired from a bar after his father passed away and had to attend a funeral, what do you do about this.
      • Discrimination
        My wife was terminated after the company she works for found out she was expecting! The company is called Cornerstone Associates. They provide home health care and such to persons needing services. I feel this is very wrong and wonder what to do.
        • Jobs
          And they wont to get rid of unions. lol
          • discrimination
            She will win.
          • discrimination
            Hope she gets all that she can,
          • Nightclubs
            TRY working at the metro nightclub on mass ave. that wonderful owner fired some there after his mom died, because he had to go and attend her funeral.
          • Discrimination
            I was a school teacher in NY and expecting my first child in 1958, before the law went into effect. Three weeks before the end of the school term, and well before I was due to deliver, my employment was terminated. I hope this woman's case prevails. Let's not go backwards!

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
           
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

          2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

          3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

          4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

          5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

          ADVERTISEMENT