IBJNews

ESPN counting on story lines to sell Indy 500

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Helio Castroneves and Dario Franchitti will be trying to become four-time Indianapolis 500 champions, four women will roll off the starting grid, a local boy is on the pole and a group of dynamic rookies that includes A.J. Allmendinger is there to add intrigue.

Indeed, there is no shortage of compelling story lines accompanying Sunday's race, leaving television executives feeling confident about another bump in viewership this year.

"What we've seen in the past couple of weeks, and in the past weekend from a story-line point of view, gives us a great opportunity to put on a terrific show for our viewers," said Rich Feinberg, ESPN's vice president in charge of motorsports production.

Television ratings for the Indy 500 dropped precipitously throughout the 1990s as attention waned and NASCAR ratings soared. And while there have been a few spikes along the way, the trend continued until ratings bottomed out in 2008.

The past few years, though, have witnessed a modest resurgence, and last year's race won by Franchitti resulted in a four-year high of nearly 6.9 million viewers.

"I long ago learned it's an exercise in futility to predict ratings," Feinberg said on a conference call with reporters. "I know the IndyCar ratings have been challenged in certain areas, but as a production team, the best thing we can do is tell these stories."

And hope that those stories turn enough casual viewers into regulars for the rest of ABC-ESPN's package of races this season, including a Saturday night race at Texas.

"We discuss how we can hopefully turn people who sample the Indy 500 into fans who can watch other races," Feinberg said, "but ultimately that's the viewer's decision. Last year's Indy 500 was tremendously successful. We have a great front row (this year), a lot of tremendous stories — those are all pieces we can drive, but at the end of the day, viewers decide."

The network is making a few tweaks to this year's telecast: ESPN anchor Lindsay Czarniak is taking over from Brent Musburger as the host of this year's race. A former pit reporter for TNT, Czarniak has appeared on some of the network's NASCAR coverage but will be making her first trip to the Indianapolis 500.

"She's wide-eyed," said Marty Reid, who will be handling lap-by-lap announcing for the eighth time. "She was here this past weekend for qualifications — she's absorbing everything."

Scott Goodyear and Eddie Cheever are back to handle analyst work, with Cheever having expanded his role with the network to include all six races it will air this season.

Then there's the technological side of the production. The network will use 84 cameras, including several dozen onboard cameras and an improved camera running over a cable above pit road that moves faster than ever. Ultra-high-speed cameras that were introduced last year also are back with a new location added entering Turn 1.

"It's right up there, not only the biggest event we've ever done in IndyCar, but it fits into the category that we've ever done in motorsports," Feinberg said. "For a single-day, single-sport event, I think 84 cameras is one of the biggest shows that ESPN does, period."

All of which ties back to the goal shared by IndyCar and its television partners of building the sport's fan base, leading to more interest and increased viewership.

Scott Dixon said he was surprised at the number of people who were at the speedway last weekend for qualifying, even though the weather was ominous, and said there are reasons to be optimistic that the series in the right direction.

"It's just getting people to watch it," said Dixon, who will 16th on Sunday. "Once they watch it, they're going to watch it again. It's getting it out there. That's the biggest deal."

Ryan Briscoe called it a "shame" that ratings have suffered.

"I think today's IndyCar racing is some of the best racing in the world. It's awesome. It's really cool to watch," said Briscoe, who will start 23rd on Sunday. "It's unfortunate that ratings are down. It deserves more, it deserves better."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • SO
    How'd that storyline angle work out? LULZ
  • Good to see no Chief comment
    I just clicked here to see if "hot air" known as chief made any foolish comments to this article . He msut be sick or lost his internet because he didnt pay his bill.
  • Hollywood
    Hollywood could step in and make a movie about the history about this forlorn series. It could be a full celebrity cast of characters. WOW. http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/02/indiana-taxpayers-forced-to-pay-for.html
  • ESPN
    True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.
  • Larry
    Larry - even though the race is on ABC, ESPN does all of the work, so that is why ESPN is mentioned. Most sports on ABC are called something like "ESPN on ABC."
  • ABC
    The race is actually on ABC, not ESPN. If it was only on ESPN, ratings would be a good bit lower as more and more people have dumped pay tv.
  • Announcers
    Lindsay is likely an upgrade over Brent Musburger but Reid and Goodyear are both pretty dull and boring. That team needs some youth. Too bad Pippa Mann is in the race. She was excellent on the radio broadcast for a couple of IndyCar races last year.
  • ESPN is horrible...
    ESPN is a horrible TV partner. They need to promote the story-lines that they want to sell. I've seen very little promotion for this year's Indy 500...
  • A Solution
    If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT