Estridge scales back Symphony development in Westfield

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The developer of the planned 1,400-acre Symphony project in Westfield is scaling back its size by about two-thirds.
The Estridge Cos. said Tuesday afternoon that it now will develop Symphony in phases rather than proceed with the entire project at once.

Company President Paul Estridge attributed the decision to the anemic residential housing market.

“Because of the weak economic climate and feedback we’ve received from members of the community, we’ve decided to significantly reduce the proposed [planned unit development] size and scope of Symphony,” he said in a prepared statement.

Estridge is reducing Symphony from a planned 1,400 acres to a size that will closer rival the Carmel-based home builder’s 436-acre Centennial development, also in Westfield.

Officials will re-evaluate the project and return to the Westfield Plan Commission with a smaller parcel for zoning consideration in the “coming weeks,” the company said.

The home builder’s decision to scale back the massive Symphony development follows its announcement last month that it would withdraw a proposal to build a massive youth sports complex within the master-planned project.

Estridge had envisioned about 150 acres of youth sports fields as part of its 1,500-acre Symphony development. The Westfield Sports Commission last month selected about 300 acres of land—about the size of the King's Island theme park—north of State Road 32 and west of State Road 31 for the sports complex.

The $1 billion Symphony project still calls for a 5,000-seat multipurpose stadium that would host an independent, minor-league baseball team, along with a new YMCA branch.

The youth sports complex is part of Westfield Mayor Andy Cook’s vision to establish the fast-growing Hamilton County suburb as the “Family Sports Capital of America.” Westfield developers Steve Henke and Beau Wilfong organized and promoted the selected site and will participate in the development of the project.

Estridge plans to develop Symphony along Towne Road between 146th and 161st streets.

“Our core vision for the area hasn’t changed, but the current economics of the project have, so we must alter our plans accordingly,” Estridge said in his statement.

As IBJ reported Sept. 16, the home builder is being sued by Bank of Indiana for allegedly failing to repay a $1 million investment the bank provided to Estridge.

The lawsuit filed in Marion Superior Court charges that Estridge, along with Indianapolis-based Indiana Securities LLC, committed securities fraud in connection with an offering the bank says was due to be paid off June 30.

Meanwhile, Cook said Westfield officials look forward to continuing to work with Estridge.

“The city of Westfield appreciates the time and resources Estridge has dedicated to Symphony,” he said in a prepared statement. “This is an economic development project cities across the country would relish.”

In its entirety, Symphony also would include condominiums and apartments, in addition to retail shops, restaurants and hotels. The project already features the Wood Wind Golf Club.

Estridge had asked Westfield to invest $70 million in the project to fund roads and sewers, as well as the stadium, which has a preliminary price tag of $15 million. Establishing a tax-increment financing district could help the city pay for the infrastructure improvements and stadium project, Cook said.


  • slightly better than ...
    An Estridge development scaled back 66% is just slightly better than Carbon Motors deal in Connersville!
  • Not in Westfield
    How can the City of Westfield continue considering giving Estridge over $75 million. Westfield is rife with half-empty subdivisions. Estridge is on the brink of bankruptcy. Estridge is being sued for a financial default. No one in Westfield wants a minor-league baseball stadium. Westfield is already committing hundreds of millions of dollars to the Grand Junction and the Sports Complex.

    No a single cent of taxpayer dollars should be spent on this project. Not a single cent.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.