Fear of GOP dominance fuels Indiana Dems' boycott

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana House Democrats, whose walkout nearly a month ago halted the legislative process, remain in no hurry to return considering they face the prospect of losing on almost every vote — including a redistricting plan that could effectively keep Republicans in power for years.

The end game in Indiana is even less clear than in Wisconsin, where Senate Democrats bolted the state days earlier to block — albeit temporarily — legislation doing away with most public bargaining rights for public workers.

While Wisconsin law requires a quorum to be present to approve financial legislation, Indiana requires it for any legislative business — no matter how minor. And, while Wisconsin's standoff was generally over labor issues, Indian's Democratic leaders have a far longer list of demands.

Badly outnumbered after November's landslide elections, most House Democrats left their duties behind almost four weeks ago for an Urbana, Ill., hotel., effectively shutting down the legislative process.

"I was not elected to sit here and just push a button," said Democratic Rep. Gail Riecken of Evansville.

Republicans sought to use their first big House majority since the early 1980s to go along with their long control of the state Senate in order to push a broad legislative agenda that on some points even exceeded the appetite of GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels.

"I think Democrats stared into the abyss and realized they were going to be on the short end of every piece of legislation," said Robert Dion, a political science professor at the University of Evansville. "No Democratic ideas would be factored in at all, in the end product."

The getaway drive by Indiana Democrats on Feb. 22 came a week after Wisconsin's Democratic senators left for Illinois in their three-week boycott against a law barring most public employees from collective bargaining. Republicans used a parliamentary maneuver to pass the law without them, and the matter now is headed to court.

While Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma argues the absent Democrats are shirking their elected obligations to debate and vote on the House floor, the Democrats say they're representing their constituents in trying to block measures they believe will hurt public schools and damage union workers' rights and incomes.

Indiana Republicans don't have the same options as Wisconsin Republicans did because the state Constitution requires two-thirds of the 100 House members to be present for any legislative business. And the block of 39 boycotters among the 40 Democratic representatives has shown no signs of returning.

The Republican leader of the Indiana Senate calls the Democratic walkout a copycat of the Wisconsin strategy and that it sets a dangerous precedent for state legislatures around the country.

Senate President Pro Tem David Long of Fort Wayne said the House Republicans must remain firm against caving in to demands.

"If the House Democrats continue to stay out, I hope that the outrage is not just in Indiana but nationally," Long said. "Our whole republican process breaks down if people are allowed to get away with what the House Democrats in Indiana are doing right now."

Neither party had held more than 53 seats in the Indiana House since a 50-50 split from the 1996 election, when Democrat Frank O'Bannon won the first of his two terms as governor.

Republicans gained a four-seat majority in the 2004 election as Daniels became the state's first GOP governor in 16 years, helping him push through proposals such as leasing off the Indiana Toll Road to fund state highway projects.

But Daniels was frustrated in four years of dealing with a Democratic-led House and organized a political action committee that spent about $1 million helping more than two dozen Republican legislative candidates on the way to winning a 60-40 majority last fall.

Democratic Rep. Win Moses of Fort Wayne said Republicans were pushing new education- and labor-related changes that were much more aggressive than their campaign agendas. Moses said the boycott was an effort to bring the debate back to the middle.

"This is our only means of reacting to that," he said. "It doesn't happen often and it shouldn't. But there are times when it has to be done."

Democrats also say they're responding to a movement by Republicans across the country to pass legislation that the labor lobby says will hurt the middle class, Democratic leader Patrick Bauer of South Bend pointed to debates over labor legislation in Wisconsin, Ohio and Michigan.

"We have a constitutional right and duty to deny a quorum when we think the majority has become tyrannical or too radical," he said.

Republicans, meanwhile, can't be blamed for feeling they've got a mandate to push an aggressive agenda and honor the electorate's wishes after such a big victory, said Dion, the political scientist.

"It leaves the minority party impotent. They have very few options to express their will," he said. "The majority Republicans are exasperated and are saying, 'Put your hand down so we can punch you in the face.'"


  • Change
    It's time to fundamentally change how our state representation works. It's ridiculous that a legislator from a dying, depopulated rural area has as much influence as a legislator from the Indy area. The sponsors of the recent harmful bills represent maybe 1/10 of the population...
  • Hold on...
    I'm sorry but that's just not true. This is exactly what the Republicans did when "Obamacare" went through Congress - in Indiana we do not have a filibuster law in the books and a walk out or caucus is the only means to force a hold on the issue. Plenty of people were angry with Republicans when they began their filibuster, and they got concessions over health care reform in the end. That is the process at the federal level, this is simply the Hoosier form of a filibuster.
  • dissapearance
    I do not believe that you ran because you were outnumbered by the Republicans. If the Republicans did that when Obamacare was put on the table they would have had more distention than you are getting from the media. Unblievable how one sided the media seems to be.
  • DUH!
    Awwww, the Dems can't play by their rules anymore, so they're just not showing up for the game. BUT IT's NOT A GAME. We have wasted a legislative session because these cowards aren't doing the job for which they were elected. I hope whoever voted for these idiots will turn their backs on them and send representatives who WILL work for Indiana and not for their own interests.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!