IBJNews

Federal filing lists another link between Brizzi, Durham

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another business tie has surfaced between Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi and embattled Indianapolis financier Tim Durham.

A federal financial-disclosure statement Brizzi submitted in May in connection with his possible run for Congress lists the politician as an investor in Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc., a small and struggling film-development firm based in Los Angeles.

Securities and Exchange Commission filings from 2007 list Durham as a Red Rock shareholder. In addition, Durham serves as CEO of Los Angeles National Lampoon Inc., which is an investor and financial partner of Red Rock. The firms operate out of adjacent Sunset Boulevard offices and teamed on the 2008 movie “National Lampoon’s Bagboy.”

The disclosure statement, which Brizzi submitted because he has contemplated running for the 5th District U.S. House seat now held by Dan Burton, lists Brizzi owning three individual stocks—Nokia, Red Rock and CLST Holdings Inc., a Dallas firm where Durham is chairman and a major shareholder.

At least four Durham-affiliated firms—National Lampoon, Red Rock, CLST and Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co.—have drawn the scrutiny of federal investigators in recent months.

Brizzi

In September, former Lampoon CEO Dan Laikin pleaded guilty to attempting to manipulate the stock price of the entertainment company. Under the former Carmel resident’s plea deal, “the government agrees that it will not bring any criminal charges against the defendant for conduct relating to any attempt to manipulate the stock price of Red Rock Pictures Holdings Inc.,” court papers say.

On Dec. 1, CLST disclosed it had received an SEC subpoena seeking a mountain of information, including paperwork related to CLST’s purchase of finance contracts from Fair.

Brizzi, 41, has not been accused of doing anything improper regarding the Durham-related investments. He also has parted ways with Fair Finance after agreeing this summer to serve as a board member.

But Brizzi’s friendship and business connections with Durham, the largest contributor to his 2006 re-election campaign, have caused increasing headaches for the Republican politician since Nov. 24, when FBI agents raided Durham’s Indianapolis office and Fair’s Akron headquarters.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office disclosed in court papers the same day that it believes Durham operated Fair like a Ponzi scheme, using money raised by selling investment certificates to Ohioans to pay earlier rounds of investors.

Brizzi acknowledged last month that he began a term on Fair’s board in September but backed out in October after Durham informed him IBJ was publishing an unflattering story about the company’s business practices.

The story questioned whether Fair, which purchases customer-finance contracts from retailers and other firms, had the financial wherewithal to repay more than $200 million owed to purchasers of investment certificates.

It also reported that, since he bought Fair Finance from Donald Fair in 2002, Durham had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful. The story noted that he and related parties owed Fair more than $168 million.

Durham, 47, has not been charged with a crime. In a recent interview with Abdul-Hakim Shabazz on WXNT-AM 1430, Brizzi said he has spoken with Durham, who doesn’t believe he has done wrong.

“He has explained to me that if this is some sort of Ponzi scheme, then every bank in America is some sort of Ponzi scheme,” Brizzi said on the show.

Brizzi declined IBJ’s requests for an interview about his investments. In an e-mail exchange, he initially said he did not think he owned stock in Red Rock. When presented with the disclosure, he said he thought he had sold it since the filing.

It’s not clear what led Brizzi to either Red Rock or CLST. In a letter to supporters he posted on his Facebook page Dec. 7, Brizzi said he began buying CLST in 2005 “after discussing the investment, as well as other companies, with friends and financial advisers as part of my overall investment planning.”

In that letter, Brizzi said, “To the best of my knowledge, there are no other businesses, stocks, or investments in which Durham and I both have an interest.” He stood by that statement after being presented with the Red Rock disclosure but didn’t respond to further inquiries.

The number of shares Brizzi owned in Red Rock wasn’t clear. Stock in the struggling business trades for less than a penny, leaving even large holdings nearly worthless. The filing listed the value of his stake at between zero and $1,000.

Details of Brizzi’s CLST investment also are sketchy. His purchases began the same year a Durham-led investment group began scarfing up shares of the firm. SEC filings don’t list Brizzi as part of that group.

In his letter to supporters, Brizzi said his current CLST stake is worth about $7,500, based on the stock price of about 10 cents a share. That indicates he owns about 75,000 shares. Purchasing that quantity in 2005 would have cost $24,000 at the stock’s low for the year and $340,500 at the stock’s high. Yet in his WXNT interview, Brizzi said he spent less than $10,000 to buy the shares.

When Brizzi acquired his stake, the company was known as CellStar Corp. and was in the cell-phone distribution business. It later sold off those operations to locally based Brightpoint Inc. and other firms and distributed $2.10 per share in cash dividends to stockholders.

CLST was in wind-down mode until about a year ago, when it suddenly began purchasing customer-finance receivables, including some from Fair Finance. Fair filings with Ohio securities regulators show that, at the time, Fair was strained for cash and was seeking money to repay purchasers of its investment certificates.

Brizzi’s disclosure statements dating to 2001 never have listed ownership of more than five individual stocks in a single year, though the federal filing from this year shows him owning more than a half dozen mutual funds, each with between $1,000 and $15,000 in assets.

Brizzi earns $125,000 a year as prosecutor and doesn’t have extensive assets. The federal filing shows he owes between $100,000 and $250,000 on a loan he took out to buy ownership interests in the local restaurant Harry & Izzy’s. The filing shows he still is paying off student loans.

Papers filed in connection with his divorce, which was finalized in February, showed he and his wife had three residences, but with first and second mortgages on all of them.•

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • LA Business Journal cover
    http://www.labusinessjournal.com/article.asp?aID=143136
  • Re
    Boy, people are pulling out the skeletons. Don Harris, the guy from New Mexico? Wow, how thought provoking.

    Personally I think it's high time that the feds put an end to Tim Durham's looting of the life savings of Ohio residents. Everyone should read the circulars the IBJ and Indianapolis Star refer to in their reporting. Durham's latest states he'll "pay the loans back when the economy improves."

    How many people reading this would help themselves to $200 Million, never pay on it until they are caught and then insist it is "loans" that they will "pay back when the economy improves?" Geez Louise!

    Tim Morrison should do what the Houston judge did to Allen Stanford and put Tim Durham in a holding cell until he figures out "where the money is." While he is at it, put Brizzi in a holding cell until his memory improves.
  • Thats right.
    As an ethics officer,i say where is the rail,i will bring some tar,you bring the feathers,,Oh yes when this happened in LA. in the 80,s all causes were retried. Mayer ,some time a feild comander has to be bold ,take charge and all that other stuff.Do to him as he does to others in his charge. Like the young lawyer Depree,i think was her name, he fired. He needs to go.Don i am not that important Harris
  • Re
    Erich:

    My sentiments exactly. Also, if you are an officer of a bank and you simply help yourself to over $200 Million (the last reported count of monies Durham redirected to himself et al) usually you go to a state jail for a long time.

    Brizzi claims he "doesn't remember" and "doesn't understand" and then he states that "Tim says..." "every bank is doing this."

    NO, CARL, every bank is not doing this. And, the insolvent banks--the ones the FDIC is shutting down--they lent money to deadbeats like your best friend Tim who didn't pay their loans. That is why they are insolvent. And, those loans went to actual customers, not to the officers of the banks.

    "Did Durham loan you any money for any of these investments? Anything? No money from Fair or any of these other companies? No personal loans or anything like that?" Eyewitness News asked Brizzi.

    "Not that I can think of, no. To the best of my knowledge. I'd have to go back. I haven't explored any of that in terms of those stocks," Brizzi said.
  • Question for the lawyers out there
    If Brizzi is found guilty of any of these alligations will that affct any of his past cases as the MCP. A layman would think that a defense attorney would jump all over this,
    • banks versus ponzi schemes
      "â??He has explained to me that if this is some sort of Ponzi scheme, then every bank in America is some sort of Ponzi scheme,â?? Brizzi said on the show."

      This exact same comment was made in the comments section of a prior IBJ article.

      Banks earn profits from the spread on interest rates on the loans they make versus the money they borrow. Ponzi schemes rely on new "investor" money to pay off prior investors.

      A nonsensical comparison. The prosecutor thinks it makes sense?
    • A Damn Shame Morrison
      and other local yokel "regulators" have to rely on regulators in Pennsylvania and Texas to clean up Indiana isn't it? Ohio blew it, too.

      When will the Hoosiers wise up?
    • Great blog commentary on Brizzi
      http://ipopa.blogspot.com/
    • re
      For those who want to understand why this is important, you can read Dan Laikin's guilty plea for felony stock manipulation.

      Notice the caveat re Red Rock Pics BEFORE THE PLEA DATE--golly Carl, you should not have stayed long on the stock, should you???

      Congrats to the fabulous SEC and IRS who have lived this case, unlike the Indiana Dept of Securities who ignored black and white flags that were painted blood red

      http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache%3AxdJaVvlP-j0J%3Awww.justice.gov%2Fusao%2Fpae%2FNews%2FPr%2F2009%2Fsep%2Flaikinchangeofpleamemo.pdf+%22daniel+laikin%22+plea+red+rock&hl=en&gl=us
    • Dan Laikin Must Have Cut
      a squeal deal and rolled over on someone else. If you read the original FBI press release on his arrest you will see there are some "pending" investigations still open.

      So Brizz's 3 for 3 as far as related parties "investments" go. Hmmmm, very interesting indeed. Has anyone bothered to explain this to Tim Morrison?
    • Big surprise
      Another stock involving Brizzi? Wow, what a shocker. He doesn't know if he has any stock in Red Rock = Hilarious. He makes himself look more guilty everytime he hits the newstands. He should just go back to silence again.
    • Re
      And the third, Nokia, just happens to have an exclusive distribution agreement with Brightpoint

      Also, Carl allegedly bought a massive position--hundreds of thousands of shares--of boiler room and Laiken-affiliated Red Rock BEFORE Dan Laikin was arrested for felony stock manipulation..... Read the plea--Feds dropped the Red Rock charge in return for the guilty plea on the Lampoon charge.....

    • It Doesn't Take A Rocket Scientist
      to figure out where Brizzi got his "tips" to invest in those 2 penny stocks, does it? Looks kinda bad if he only have investments in 3 publicly traded issuers and 2 of the 3 are penny stocks which Laikin and/or Durham also had large stakes in.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

    2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

    3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

    4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

    5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

    ADVERTISEMENT