IBJNews

Finish Line launches running venture, reports strong sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Finish Line Inc. will partner with a private equity firm in hopes of building a dominant position in specialty running that includes a new website called Run.com, the Indianapolis-based retailer announced Friday.

The company also reported strong fourth-quarter earnings boosted by brisk sales of running shoes, but its outlook for a lower first-quarter profit sent shares tumbling.

Denver-based Gart Capital Partners has agreed to invest $10 million in Finish Line's Running Specialty Group, which operates The Running Company chain of 19 stores, and will take over day-to-day operations from its Colorado headquarters. Finish Line acquired the chain last summer.

Finish Line will retain majority ownership of the running endeavor, which hopes to capitalize on the $1 billion specialty running market by acquiring other operators and building a Web experience that combines running advice and a sense of community with shoe and apparel sales. The website is scheduled to launch in the spring.

Finish Line chose to partner with Gart because of the firm's experience quickly rolling up previously independent retail shops, including a joint venture with Vail Resorts Inc. that owns 150 ski shops, Finish Line CEO Glenn Lyon told Wall Street analysts on a conference call.

"Others will join and others will play, but we think we're out there first," Lyon said of the move to acquire running-focused retail shops. "We want to be most aggressive, and it gives me the most confidence knowing I have strong partners who know the business, know the game, are highly motivated to grow rapidly."

Also Friday, Finish Line released fourth-quarter and fiscal year earnings that exceeded Wall Street expectations. But the firm's guidance proved unnerving to investors, who bid the shares down more than 13 percent in trading midday Friday.

For the quarter ended March 3, Finish Line reported earnings of $41.9 million, or 80 cents a share, compared with $34.3 million, or 63 cents per share, in the same period a year earlier.

The chain reported quarterly revenue of $456.3 million, an 18.6-percent jump from the same period last year. Same-store sales rose an impressive 10.8 percent, the 10th consecutive quarter the chain reported a gain in the key metric. Running shoes were strong performers again, along with Nike Elite socks. Online sales jumped 38.3 percent and now make up 11 percent of the chain's total.

But the company's first-quarter guidance gave investors pause. Finish Line said it expects earnings per share to drop about 30 percent below last year's 65 cents per share thanks to lower margins from an upcoming sale and planned investments to update the chain's in-store technology and add a social media operation.

Finish Line also plans to add 25 new stores this year and refresh dozens more, while closing between 10 and 20 underperforming locations. Between May and November, the chain plans to roll out new point-of-sale systems that include hand-held tablets in its 635 stores, Finish Line executives noted on the call with analysts.

The company expects to spend about $85 million for the capital expenditures, well above last year's $29 million total.

Lyon said investments in technology are essential for Finish Line to remain competitive and continue to build market share.

"Retail is changed forever," he noted. "We must align all of the different components of our business to deliver a consistent, seamless brand experience for our customers across all channels and in all touch points, brick-and-mortar stores, digital, mobile, social, e-mail and catalogues."

Investors were spooked, though. Finish Line shares fell more than 13 percent, to $21.99, in trading Friday.

For the fiscal year ended March 3, Finish Line had no interest-bearing debt and $307.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. In the fourth quarter, the company repurchased 300,000 of its shares for $5.9 million, and it still has 3.8 million shares remaining on a buyback plan to retire 5 million shares.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT