IBJNews

Finish Line launches running venture, reports strong sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Finish Line Inc. will partner with a private equity firm in hopes of building a dominant position in specialty running that includes a new website called Run.com, the Indianapolis-based retailer announced Friday.

The company also reported strong fourth-quarter earnings boosted by brisk sales of running shoes, but its outlook for a lower first-quarter profit sent shares tumbling.

Denver-based Gart Capital Partners has agreed to invest $10 million in Finish Line's Running Specialty Group, which operates The Running Company chain of 19 stores, and will take over day-to-day operations from its Colorado headquarters. Finish Line acquired the chain last summer.

Finish Line will retain majority ownership of the running endeavor, which hopes to capitalize on the $1 billion specialty running market by acquiring other operators and building a Web experience that combines running advice and a sense of community with shoe and apparel sales. The website is scheduled to launch in the spring.

Finish Line chose to partner with Gart because of the firm's experience quickly rolling up previously independent retail shops, including a joint venture with Vail Resorts Inc. that owns 150 ski shops, Finish Line CEO Glenn Lyon told Wall Street analysts on a conference call.

"Others will join and others will play, but we think we're out there first," Lyon said of the move to acquire running-focused retail shops. "We want to be most aggressive, and it gives me the most confidence knowing I have strong partners who know the business, know the game, are highly motivated to grow rapidly."

Also Friday, Finish Line released fourth-quarter and fiscal year earnings that exceeded Wall Street expectations. But the firm's guidance proved unnerving to investors, who bid the shares down more than 13 percent in trading midday Friday.

For the quarter ended March 3, Finish Line reported earnings of $41.9 million, or 80 cents a share, compared with $34.3 million, or 63 cents per share, in the same period a year earlier.

The chain reported quarterly revenue of $456.3 million, an 18.6-percent jump from the same period last year. Same-store sales rose an impressive 10.8 percent, the 10th consecutive quarter the chain reported a gain in the key metric. Running shoes were strong performers again, along with Nike Elite socks. Online sales jumped 38.3 percent and now make up 11 percent of the chain's total.

But the company's first-quarter guidance gave investors pause. Finish Line said it expects earnings per share to drop about 30 percent below last year's 65 cents per share thanks to lower margins from an upcoming sale and planned investments to update the chain's in-store technology and add a social media operation.

Finish Line also plans to add 25 new stores this year and refresh dozens more, while closing between 10 and 20 underperforming locations. Between May and November, the chain plans to roll out new point-of-sale systems that include hand-held tablets in its 635 stores, Finish Line executives noted on the call with analysts.

The company expects to spend about $85 million for the capital expenditures, well above last year's $29 million total.

Lyon said investments in technology are essential for Finish Line to remain competitive and continue to build market share.

"Retail is changed forever," he noted. "We must align all of the different components of our business to deliver a consistent, seamless brand experience for our customers across all channels and in all touch points, brick-and-mortar stores, digital, mobile, social, e-mail and catalogues."

Investors were spooked, though. Finish Line shares fell more than 13 percent, to $21.99, in trading Friday.

For the fiscal year ended March 3, Finish Line had no interest-bearing debt and $307.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. In the fourth quarter, the company repurchased 300,000 of its shares for $5.9 million, and it still has 3.8 million shares remaining on a buyback plan to retire 5 million shares.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT