IBJNews

Fire heavily damages Aristocrat restaurant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An early-morning fire Thursday caused about $1.5 million in damage to the Aristocrat Pub & Restaurant—a landmark in the Meridian-Kessler neighborhood since 1933.

Indianapolis firefighters were called to 5212 N. College Ave. at 3:39 a.m. and had the blaze under control in a little more than an hour.

The interior of the two-story, 6,000-square-foot brick structure sustained extensive damage, according to the Indianapolis Fire Department.

Restaurant owner Rick Rising-Moore, who lives next door to the building, discovered the fire after hearing the smoke alarms. Once inside, he encountered heavy smoke throughout the building, IFD said.

Three residents who live above the building in apartments all got out safely.

Firefighters encountered difficulties of extreme high heat and heavy smoke while navigating a maze of narrow hallways, tables, chairs and kitchen equipment, IFD said.

It took about 30 minutes for firefighters to locate the area where the fire originated. Three separate hallways leading to different areas of the building delayed their efforts, according to IFD’s report.

Twenty-three units were dispatched to the fire, which remains under investigation.

Rising-Moore has owned the restaurant since 1986. It has 35 employees.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Neighbors
    It's really too bad for the workers,. I'm sure the neighbors are wishing they hadn't so blindly supported blocking calle 52.
  • Agree with Preston
    Love Aristocrat's. Hope they'll be back in business asap. God speed!
  • Ugh!!!
    So sorry to hear this sad news, this is one of our go-to places for good food, great staff and just an all-around nice place. In the summer, you could sit outside and in the winter, settle into the warmth of the interior. Here's hoping for a speedy recovery and rebuilding!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT