IBJNews

Fire heavily damages Aristocrat restaurant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An early-morning fire Thursday caused about $1.5 million in damage to the Aristocrat Pub & Restaurant—a landmark in the Meridian-Kessler neighborhood since 1933.

Indianapolis firefighters were called to 5212 N. College Ave. at 3:39 a.m. and had the blaze under control in a little more than an hour.

The interior of the two-story, 6,000-square-foot brick structure sustained extensive damage, according to the Indianapolis Fire Department.

Restaurant owner Rick Rising-Moore, who lives next door to the building, discovered the fire after hearing the smoke alarms. Once inside, he encountered heavy smoke throughout the building, IFD said.

Three residents who live above the building in apartments all got out safely.

Firefighters encountered difficulties of extreme high heat and heavy smoke while navigating a maze of narrow hallways, tables, chairs and kitchen equipment, IFD said.

It took about 30 minutes for firefighters to locate the area where the fire originated. Three separate hallways leading to different areas of the building delayed their efforts, according to IFD’s report.

Twenty-three units were dispatched to the fire, which remains under investigation.

Rising-Moore has owned the restaurant since 1986. It has 35 employees.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Neighbors
    It's really too bad for the workers,. I'm sure the neighbors are wishing they hadn't so blindly supported blocking calle 52.
  • Agree with Preston
    Love Aristocrat's. Hope they'll be back in business asap. God speed!
  • Ugh!!!
    So sorry to hear this sad news, this is one of our go-to places for good food, great staff and just an all-around nice place. In the summer, you could sit outside and in the winter, settle into the warmth of the interior. Here's hoping for a speedy recovery and rebuilding!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT