IBJNews

First Internet Bancorp seeking to list on NASDAQ

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

First Internet Bancorp, parent of Indianapolis-based First Internet Bank of Indiana, is seeking to have its stock traded on the NASDAQ exchange.

The company announced Tuesday that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to make the move from the over-the-counter board.

Company shares, which opened Wednesday morning priced at $19.25 each, have been listed on the thinly traded OTC market under the FIBP ticker symbol since 2005.

Chairman and CEO David Becker said in a prepared statement that he expects the change to be completed sometime next year.

“The board of directors believes that our plan to move from the over-the-counter market to a national exchange will enhance the trading market for our stock and provide a long-term benefit to our shareholders,” he said.

Becker founded First Internet Bank in 1999. The bank has no branches and has 95 employees at its corporate headquarters at 9200 Keystone Crossing. First Internet said in its SEC filing that it expects to move early next year into 23,891 square feet of space, which is more than 9,000 square feet larger than its current office.

For the quarter ended Sept. 30, the company earned $1.6 million, or 85 cents per share, compared with $765,000, or 40 cents per share, during the same period last year.

Through the first nine months of 2012, the bank reported profit of $4 million, or $2.12 per share, compared with $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, in the year-ago period.

First Internet attributed the increase to gains on loans sold and growth in deposits.

Loans held for sale totaled $55.5 million as of Sept. 30, compared with $44.4 million at the same time in 2011.

Total deposits in the third quarter grew 13 percent, to $522.7 million.

Assets increased 12 percent, to a record $627.7 million.

On Nov. 20, the bank announced a cash dividend of 25 cents per share payable Dec. 28, the first dividend the bank has ever paid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT