Former Star columnist suing newspaper

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former columnist for The Indianapolis Star who was dismissed from her job is suing the newspaper for age discrimination.

Susan J. Guyett filed her lawsuit in a federal court in Indianapolis on Monday after the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission gave its support for her to sue.

Guyett, 61, filed a charge of discrimination with the agency in May 2009 following her dismissal in December 2008. She had been employed at the newspaper since November 2000.

Guyett, who wrote the “Talk of Our Town” column, said in the lawsuit that her position was eliminated as part of a “cost-cutting measure.”

The content and concept of the feature remained the same, however, after the column was assigned to another reporter, the lawsuit said.

The Star and its owner, Virginia-based Gannett Co. Inc., are named in the complaint. Editor Dennis Ryerson did not return phone calls seeking comment.

“Defendants discriminated against Guyett on the basis of her age by terminating her employment because of her age and replacing her with a younger staff member, under the age of 40, to write the same column that Guyett had written for years,” the suit alleges.

Guyett is seeking to recover back pay as well as damages for lost future earnings, emotional distress, and pain and suffering.

This is not the first discrimination case the Star has faced from former employees.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the newspaper in December after finding that two former editorial writers failed to prove they were the victims of religious discrimination

James Patterson and Lisa M. Coffey claimed their former employer engaged in systematic discrimination against “traditional Christians” who believe homosexual conduct is a sin. They said the Star’s top editors opposed public expression of religion in the work place and discriminated against those who opposed homosexual conduct because of their religion. Patterson and Coffey also argued the paper “softened” its views on homosexuality once Ryerson became the editor.

A district court initially ruled against Patterson and Coffey. In the ruling from the Circuit Court of Appeals, judges noted that they accepted the Star’s version of the facts, just as the district court did.

Guyett’s complaint, meanwhile, contends the Indianapolis Newspaper Guild filed a grievance on behalf of her and several other members of the union, alleging their terminations breached seniority requirements.

The guild agreed to a settlement in which the Star and Gannett paid a small sum of money to satisfy the grievance. Guyett, though, did not consent to the settlement, the suit said.

In a separate matter, the guild on April 19 filed a grievance against the newspaper over the outsourcing of work that it claims violates the union contract.

The complaint involves the Star’s use of baseball content produced by USA Today, which also is owned by Gannett. The work had been performed by page designers and copy editors represented by the guild.

“The Guild must step in and defend our jobs—otherwise ‘free’ and pre-produced copy makes its way into the paper,” a notice about the grievance said.

It cited as an example the News From You feature that allows readers to submit stories from the suburbs.

Outside Indianapolis, a decision by Gannett to allow an employee of the New Jersey Devils to provide coverage of the hockey team for six of its newspapers in the state is raising plenty of ethics questions.

The New York Times said the arrangement may be a coup for the hockey team, but it “puts the papers in the odd position of publishing news coverage supplied by the entity being covered.”

The Indianapolis-based Society of Professional Journalists agreed in a press release issued Tuesday.

“Economically squeezed journalists might seek more efficient ways to cover news, but ceding journalistic duties to newsmakers and giving space to what could be seen as glorified press releases is a poor choice,” SPJ said. “It cheapens journalism.”


  • Appreciation
    Susan Guyett was a pleasure to deal with professionally and what she wrote she did well---it's a column that reports on events that benefit charity.Urban Guy's comments are right on the mark. It's private not-for-profits that provide help for kids, sick people, social services,disease research, our arts and culture activities that set us apart from being just anyplace or no-place. It's been hard to watch as the Star gets rid of experienced reporters and really good writers. Gannett has really hurt journalism in this country as it acquires newspapers across the country. They only care about a wide profit margin for their stockholders which they achieve by cutting experienced professionals and reducing the staff size.
    Many people who are active in this community as volunteers for non-profits will join me in saying that Susan Guyett did this city a lot of good during the years she wrote this column and covered chairty events. Thank you Susan!
  • Not True
    In that this column features the people who attend charity events in support of worthwhile organziations, yes that's is not everyone in the community. But when you see the range programs in services which serve many people for free or on a discounted basis, the attendees of such events are helping many at risk, under-served or marginalized citizens. For years Susan Guyett did her best to publilize this charitable endeavors and that encouraged other people to attend and contribute. Benefit events raise money to help non-profits help people. I for one say thank you to Ms Guyette for the good work she did while with the Star!
  • Support Susan
    Despite the earlier comment, during my experiences with Susan, I never encountered the suggested elitist attitude. She covered many events that I know she had no connection with.
  • Hope she loses
    Susan Guyett is anything but a journalist. Calling her such is truly an insult to the profession. She is an elitist socialite wannabe who chose what to cover in her column based upon who was involved and attended. If a newsworthy event did not have a connection to her, it did not get reported. Hopefully she loses this lawsuit and leaves town...we'd all be better off.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?