IBJNews

FUNNY BUSINESS: One paper goes Britney-free-it's a darn good start

Mike Redmond
March 17, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With the possible exception of the people who run this newspaper and either allow me to write for it or haven't noticed that I do, David Little is the greatest newspaperman in America today.

Little is the editor of the Chico (Calif.) Enterprise-Record, who declared his paper a Britney-free publication-No Spears, None Of The Time. He wrote in his column:

"This is a woman who seems to have mental health issues, shall we say. We'd never make light of a local citizen with the same problems, yet it's somehow OK because Britney's a has-been star?

"We don't write about child-custody cases, either, but Britney's family fight is somehow elevated to newsworthiness?

"This is beyond pathetic. The woman needs to be left alone, for her sake as well as her children's. If the media circus quits trailing her, maybe she'll get help. Maybe she won't. Maybe it's none of our business."

Preach, Brother Little-even though we live in a world where the assistant chief of the Associated Press Los Angeles Bureau told his staff, "Now and for the foreseeable future, virtually everything involving Britney is a big deal."

Or a world where People magazine pays $1.5 million for exclusive photos of Christina Aguilera and her baby-and reportedly was bidding $4 million to $6 million for photos of the twins born to Jennifer Lopez and her husband, Mr. Jennifer Lopez.

Or a world where the once-esteemed Wolf Blitzer reported almost nightly on the death of celebrity/model/parade balloon Anna Nicole Smith.

Or a world where a good deal of the media seems to have taken the scrutiny and judgment (if we may call it that) it uses for celebrity coverage and applied it to presidential campaigns, God help us.

Little took a stand against it when the Enterprise-Record became Britney-Free-at first for a month, and now indefinitely.

"The media's fixation on America's favorite unnatural disaster will have to go on without us," he wrote.

Now, guess how many readers complained. Here's a hint: It's fewer than one.

Evidently, the people in Chico (hometown of Phillies catcher Clay Dalrymple, who showed up in every pack of baseball cards I purchased in 1963 at Brosnan's Drug Store) know a good thing when they see it. No, wait. Evidently, they know a bad thing when they don't see it. No, that doesn't work, either. Ah. I have it: Evidently, the people in Chico know that not seeing a bad thing can be a good thing.

"I'm not entirely sure what the people of Chico think," Little said in an e-mail. "Maybe they haven't noticed. Maybe they don't read my column (it is, after all, a community with exceedingly good taste). Of all the people I've heard from, nobody thinks it's a bad idea. Nobody's clamoring for more BS. Nobody has canceled the newspaper because we're a Britney-Free Zone."

The rest of us are stuck with the kind of journalism that, in desperate attempts to (a) attract the 18-to-34-year-old nonreader while (b) slashing resources and staff so as to (c) keep the profits high for its corporate overlords, has gotten sillier and sillier. It's widely assumed, you see, that younger readers aren't interested in actual news but can't get enough about celebrities-especially celebrities who run off the rails like Ms. Spears. No wonder they don't read newspapers, if that's all newspapers think of them.

As for David Little's Brit Ban, I see it as the proper, grown-up thing for a newspaper to do-even though it flies in the face of the popular practice of letting readers decide what is news, a practice that so far has resulted mostly in pictures of dogs in costumes.

Besides, it's not like the readers can't get ANY Brit news in Chico. It's on the paper's Web site as part of the AP feed. The ban applies to the print product only.

Hey, it's a start.

"Will it make a difference if one newspaper in little ol' Chico quits running news about Britney Spears?" wrote Little. "Not one whit. But it will make me feel better. It will make me feel a little less disgusted with my lifetime profession."

Amen, Brother Little.



Redmond is an author, columnist and speaker, and a consultant on business writing and workplace issues. His column appears monthly. You can reach him at mredmond@ibj.com.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT