IBJNews

Health care reform will go on regardless of federal government

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Massachusetts’ election of a Republican senator has put health reform legislation on life support. But for the health care industry, reform is a reality that isn’t going to die.

That’s because health care is, quite simply, too expensive. And health care providers and insurers realize their path to growing profits will hinge on reducing costs, not simply signing up more of the most-profitable patients.

On top of that, the massive federal Medicare program is projected to be insolvent in seven years. Its administrators already were and are using their ample regulatory powers to create ways to pay for health care that will, ideally, squeeze out waste.

Shapurji

“The cost issues will still, clearly, be there,” said Dhan Shapurji, an Indianapolis-based Deloitte consultant to health insurers and hospitals. “The Medicare cuts are going to happen regardless of what happens with ObamaCare.”

Since private health insurers, such as Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., often follow Medicare’s lead on payment rates, hospitals and doctors have little hope that they’ll be paid more handsomely for what they do.

“They know that there’s no more money coming into the system,” said Bill Thompson, managing partner of Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, a multistate health care law firm based in Indianapolis. Rather, he said, government and insurers are trying to create programs that reward health care providers for figuring out how to save money.

Doctors and hospitals will continue merging even if national health reform falls by the wayside.

“In order to respond to what the market is demanding,” Thompson said, “they have to be more efficient, they have to coordinate care, they have to have a patient-centric model of health care delivery, all supported by health information technology.”

That merger mania will extend to all parts of the health care industry—insurers, doctors, hospitals and even pharmaceutical companies, said Shapurji. And those that don’t merge will be signing many more affiliations and joint ventures with their peers.

If Republican Scott Brown’s stunning Jan. 19 Senate victory in Massachusetts does derail health care reform, the biggest loss to the health care industry will be the 30 million newly insured customers health reform would have created.

That means drugmakers such as Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. won’t get a new wave of people able to pay for their pricy medicines. It also means hospitals will still treat many people who cannot pay their bills and try to make up the loss by charging higher prices to private health insurers and their customers.

“That knotty problem is going to continue to exist,” Thompson said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT