IBJNews

Health insurers could pay $16.5M in rebates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Health insurance customers in Indiana will get an estimated $16.5 million in rebates this year, but the average amount received per person will be less than the national average and just a small chunk of the total cost of coverage.

Those are the results of an analysis released last week by the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation. It analyzed new filings by health insurers, mandated by the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, filed with nearly all states nationwide.

The law requires that health insurers spend at least 80 percent of their customers’ premiums on medical care, as opposed to overhead or profit. For large employers, the requirement is 85 percent.

All told, the nation’s insurers estimate they will hand back $1.3 billion to their consumers, or an average of $127 per person covered by a rebate-paying plan, according to the Kaiser report. For a family of four, the rebates would be $500—or about 3 percent of the typical cost of family coverage, according to Kaiser survey data.

In Indiana, the average rebate per person is projected to be $45—or $180 for a family of four. The actual rebates, which will be paid in August, likely will vary from the estimates.

Indiana’s small-employer health plans will see the biggest chunk of rebates—$10.9 million. More than three out of every five people insured by such plans are estimated to receive a rebate—over double the national average.

The rebates are projected to average $47.26 per person, or for a family of four, about $189. Most of those savings will go back to employers, however, not to individuals, since employers pay the majority of health insurance premiums for their workers.

The percentage of enrollees receiving rebates ranked Indiana No. 7 out of 41 states’ small group markets analyzed in the Kaiser report. But the average amount of rebates were smaller in Indiana than in all but 11 other states in the report.

About 75 percent of those small employer rebates--or about $8.2 million--are expected to be handed out by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana, according to a filing with the Indiana Department of Insurance. Anthem expects to issue no rebates to its individual or large employer customers.

Anthem is by far the largest health insurer in Indiana. Among employers that actually purchase insurance—as opposed to merely hiring Anthem to process medical bills—Anthem claims 63 percent of the small-employer market and 66 percent of the large-employer market, according to data from the actuarial firm Milliman.

In the individual market, Anthem claims about 60 percent of all customers.

Indiana ranked 16th highest for the percentage of individual health plan enrollees in rebate-paying plans, according to the Kaiser report. Nearly one-third, or 31 percent, of Hoosiers with individual health insurance are in health plans that are projected to pay a rebate—which equaled the national aveage.

But the amount those customers will get is $27.43—or about $110 for a family of four—which ranks No. 40 out of the 47 states cited in the report. Total rebates in the individual market were estimated to be $2 million.

For large employers, which includes any company with more than 50 workers, only 17 percent of their health plan members are in line for a rebate. That percentage ranks Indiana No. 12 among the 34 states included in that portion of Kaiser’s report. But it was a tick under the national average of 19 percent.

For large-group workers and dependents receiving rebates, they can expect $56.37 apiece—or $226 for a family of four.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT