IBJNews

Health insurers could pay $16.5M in rebates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Health insurance customers in Indiana will get an estimated $16.5 million in rebates this year, but the average amount received per person will be less than the national average and just a small chunk of the total cost of coverage.

Those are the results of an analysis released last week by the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation. It analyzed new filings by health insurers, mandated by the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, filed with nearly all states nationwide.

The law requires that health insurers spend at least 80 percent of their customers’ premiums on medical care, as opposed to overhead or profit. For large employers, the requirement is 85 percent.

All told, the nation’s insurers estimate they will hand back $1.3 billion to their consumers, or an average of $127 per person covered by a rebate-paying plan, according to the Kaiser report. For a family of four, the rebates would be $500—or about 3 percent of the typical cost of family coverage, according to Kaiser survey data.

In Indiana, the average rebate per person is projected to be $45—or $180 for a family of four. The actual rebates, which will be paid in August, likely will vary from the estimates.

Indiana’s small-employer health plans will see the biggest chunk of rebates—$10.9 million. More than three out of every five people insured by such plans are estimated to receive a rebate—over double the national average.

The rebates are projected to average $47.26 per person, or for a family of four, about $189. Most of those savings will go back to employers, however, not to individuals, since employers pay the majority of health insurance premiums for their workers.

The percentage of enrollees receiving rebates ranked Indiana No. 7 out of 41 states’ small group markets analyzed in the Kaiser report. But the average amount of rebates were smaller in Indiana than in all but 11 other states in the report.

About 75 percent of those small employer rebates--or about $8.2 million--are expected to be handed out by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana, according to a filing with the Indiana Department of Insurance. Anthem expects to issue no rebates to its individual or large employer customers.

Anthem is by far the largest health insurer in Indiana. Among employers that actually purchase insurance—as opposed to merely hiring Anthem to process medical bills—Anthem claims 63 percent of the small-employer market and 66 percent of the large-employer market, according to data from the actuarial firm Milliman.

In the individual market, Anthem claims about 60 percent of all customers.

Indiana ranked 16th highest for the percentage of individual health plan enrollees in rebate-paying plans, according to the Kaiser report. Nearly one-third, or 31 percent, of Hoosiers with individual health insurance are in health plans that are projected to pay a rebate—which equaled the national aveage.

But the amount those customers will get is $27.43—or about $110 for a family of four—which ranks No. 40 out of the 47 states cited in the report. Total rebates in the individual market were estimated to be $2 million.

For large employers, which includes any company with more than 50 workers, only 17 percent of their health plan members are in line for a rebate. That percentage ranks Indiana No. 12 among the 34 states included in that portion of Kaiser’s report. But it was a tick under the national average of 19 percent.

For large-group workers and dependents receiving rebates, they can expect $56.37 apiece—or $226 for a family of four.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT