IBJNews

Health insurers could pay $16.5M in rebates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health insurance customers in Indiana will get an estimated $16.5 million in rebates this year, but the average amount received per person will be less than the national average and just a small chunk of the total cost of coverage.

Those are the results of an analysis released last week by the California-based Kaiser Family Foundation. It analyzed new filings by health insurers, mandated by the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, filed with nearly all states nationwide.

The law requires that health insurers spend at least 80 percent of their customers’ premiums on medical care, as opposed to overhead or profit. For large employers, the requirement is 85 percent.

All told, the nation’s insurers estimate they will hand back $1.3 billion to their consumers, or an average of $127 per person covered by a rebate-paying plan, according to the Kaiser report. For a family of four, the rebates would be $500—or about 3 percent of the typical cost of family coverage, according to Kaiser survey data.

In Indiana, the average rebate per person is projected to be $45—or $180 for a family of four. The actual rebates, which will be paid in August, likely will vary from the estimates.

Indiana’s small-employer health plans will see the biggest chunk of rebates—$10.9 million. More than three out of every five people insured by such plans are estimated to receive a rebate—over double the national average.

The rebates are projected to average $47.26 per person, or for a family of four, about $189. Most of those savings will go back to employers, however, not to individuals, since employers pay the majority of health insurance premiums for their workers.

The percentage of enrollees receiving rebates ranked Indiana No. 7 out of 41 states’ small group markets analyzed in the Kaiser report. But the average amount of rebates were smaller in Indiana than in all but 11 other states in the report.

About 75 percent of those small employer rebates--or about $8.2 million--are expected to be handed out by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana, according to a filing with the Indiana Department of Insurance. Anthem expects to issue no rebates to its individual or large employer customers.

Anthem is by far the largest health insurer in Indiana. Among employers that actually purchase insurance—as opposed to merely hiring Anthem to process medical bills—Anthem claims 63 percent of the small-employer market and 66 percent of the large-employer market, according to data from the actuarial firm Milliman.

In the individual market, Anthem claims about 60 percent of all customers.

Indiana ranked 16th highest for the percentage of individual health plan enrollees in rebate-paying plans, according to the Kaiser report. Nearly one-third, or 31 percent, of Hoosiers with individual health insurance are in health plans that are projected to pay a rebate—which equaled the national aveage.

But the amount those customers will get is $27.43—or about $110 for a family of four—which ranks No. 40 out of the 47 states cited in the report. Total rebates in the individual market were estimated to be $2 million.

For large employers, which includes any company with more than 50 workers, only 17 percent of their health plan members are in line for a rebate. That percentage ranks Indiana No. 12 among the 34 states included in that portion of Kaiser’s report. But it was a tick under the national average of 19 percent.

For large-group workers and dependents receiving rebates, they can expect $56.37 apiece—or $226 for a family of four.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT