Buses in Bloomington and on the Indiana University campus could lose funding starting in 2014 if local officials don't
include Interstate 69 in their transportation infrastructure plans.
The current transportation plan, called a TIP, ends in June 2013. The Bloomington/Monroe County Metropolitan Planning Organization's
policy committee voted in May to exclude I-69 construction from a plan covering fiscal years 2012-15, citing concerns about
how it will be funded, its environmental impact and the location of interchanges.
State officials say they need the group's backing to spend federal money on a 1.75-mile intended link with Indiana 37
near Bloomington. Republican Sens. Richard Lugar and Dan Coats and seven of Indiana's nine congressmen have urged the
group change its mind on the 142-mile Indianapolis-to-Evansville highway, which is estimated to cost nearly $3 billion to
build.
"Completion of the I-69 project will enhance Indiana's interstate network by linking all four corners of the state
with Indianapolis," they said in a letter to Mayor Mark Kruzan. "The direct route from Evansville to the state capitol
will create a corridor that will encourage private sector investment and help create much-needed jobs for our fellow citizens."
The state highway department has asked the group to reconsider its opposition.
If the group votes against including the highway in its transportation plan, the Indiana Department of Transportation will
withhold federal funding not just for local highway projects, but also for local transit systems including Bloomington Transit,
Rural Transit and the IU Campus Bus system, starting in 2014, The Herald-Times reported.
Kent McDaniel, who represents the Bloomington Transit board of directors on the policy committee, said the entire county
would be affected if the state rejects the local transportation infrastructure plan that covers 2014 and 2015. County transportation
services stand to lose nearly $30 million in federal funding for those years.
McDaniel said that would mean no new federal money to replace buses, expand the bus garage or address other future needs.
"Saying 'no' to federal funding is, I would say, crippling to public transit," said Richard Martin, chairman
of the panel's I-69 subcommittee.
I-69 opponent Tom Tokarski said he isn't sure federal funding cuts for local transit would happen.
Tokarski noted Gov. Mitch Daniels will be out of office and a new administration will be making transportation spending decisions
before the federal cutoff would occur.
Opponent Mark Stoops agreed.
"Any incoming governor is going to look at the price of running I-69 from Bloomington to Indy and consider, 'Would
that be a good investment?'" Stoops said.
Stoops said losing federal transportation funds would be a short-term challenge, but I-69 would be "here forever."
"I think the consequences of cuts to short-term funding because we do not approve I-69 are less than long-term costs
of having I-69 in Monroe County," Stoops said. "I can't imagine that any future governor is going to want to
pursue I-69, knowing the costs and difficulty."
Policy Committee President Jack Baker, however, said he is resigned that I-69 will be completed.
"I don't want it, I don't like it, but I think it is inevitable," he said.
The panel is scheduled to take up the issue again Nov. 4.

















IBJ Conversations
17 Comments
Add Comment
outsource jobs previously held by Americans.
Now it makes much less sense unless we can get the Mexicans to build the I-369 Spur to
Viet Nam and China, where the outsourced jobs
were outsourced again. BTW the great job
generator of the area, Crane NW, was given
recent support for future new development
w/o any guarantee 69 would be finished.
get half measures passed for 69, or the NW
toll road, or the Commerce Connector no one
wanted to fund the new road. Then tweaking the design of 69 to eliminate exits and pavement depth, which will lead to excessive maintainence in the near future. Not to mention the divergence of funds to fix the infrastructure we already have built. Now we find there really is no local input going to be tolerated by the administration and INDOT. Tow the line or we will cut off your highway funding. The township system surely has its flaws, but it makes you think - what is the motivation for separating people from purely local government entities? It appears, whether true or not, that the governor's supporters had to be satisfied at any price. Well,at least we can take solace from all the jobs we'll garner from this development, along with benefits we got from Daylight Savings Time.
The funding and need for this road is simple. Private Industry growth i.e. (manufacturing) which the majority of the current population of Monroe County is equipped for, comes from better access and efficient shipping. Neither will be achieved with the current road system available for Industry. I would also like to put forth the the thought as to what this area will look in twenty years? Take look at these area's that have similiar travel restraints -Clive UT, Richland WS, Branwell SC, Andrews Cty, TX and see what industry they all have in common. HINT - instead of "Gods Country" more like Landfill Country.