IBJNews

City inks long-term deal with motorsports show

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Officials of the International Motorsports Industry Show and the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association announced an agreement Wednesday to keep the show in the city indefinitely.

The deal, which was initially signed for the years 2009 and 2010, was extended through 2015 in December. The latest agreement says the event will remain in Indianapolis for the life of the convention.

ICVA estimates the event generates more than $15.9 million in direct visitor spending for the city. Attendance for the inaugural show, held in December, topped 10,000. It also drew 345 exhibitors.

This year’s convention, set for Dec. 1-3, is expected to draw more than 20,000 visitors as well as 575 exhibitors.

“It is only fitting for the ‘Racing Capital of the World’ to permanently host the premier racing industry tradeshow, a show that brings together the entire global motorsports business,” ICVA President and CEO Don Welsh said in a prepared statement.

Indianapolis-based IMIS is owned by Tom Weisenbach, executive director of the Indiana Motorsports Association; Chris Paulsen, owner of C&R Racing Inc.; Jeff Stoops, president of Stoops Freightliner; and NASCAR driver and Indiana resident Tony Stewart.

“After shattering our projections for our inaugural show in 2009 and overwhelming positive feedback from attendees, we are confident in this deliberate decision to keep our show in Indianapolis,” Weisenbach said in a statement.

Indianapolis previously hosted a similar motorsports trade show, Performance Racing Industry Show, operated by a California-based group. Now held in Orlando, it was here until it outgrew the Indiana Convention Center in 2004.

A $275 million convention center expansion that will add 254,000 square feet of exhibit space is set to be finished in January.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Surpass
    I think it is amazing how fast the crew from IMIS was able to surpass the PRI show. In a short two years it has grown to almost overtake PRI and this year in sure itâ??s crowd will eclipse the Orlando PRI crowd. My company did GREAT Business there last year and we canâ??t wait till this year. Orlando is just another spinning wheel and hotrod show. IMIS is the true Motorsports Industry Show
  • Heading for bigger problems
    The ICVA should have waited until after the 2010 Show to cut any deal. The truth is the IMIS attendance list from last year had only 6,000 names on it...not 10,000. 70% were within a 4-hour drive of Indianapolis. People with international addresses were less than half a percent. Local racers and their friends drove in, walked the show in two to four hours, then drove home and didn't return for the second day. One day of attendance. And the IMIS expanded what is at best a one-day show to three days this year? They added another dead day? And they announced their raising rates next year? The IMIS is simply one of four racer consumer shows in Indianapolis in the off-season for local racers and their pals.
  • WTF?
    It says "NASCAR driver & Indiana resident Tony Stewart"... Ha! Tony lives in Mooresville, NC.
  • ?
    They must have made a typo: Indy IS racing? NO! Indy WAS racing. Sad but true.
  • Competitor to PRI?
    There is no competitor, I agree with James. PRI is the place to be if you want to do business.
  • Consumer Show
    No competitor. PRI is trade only. The Indy show is a consumer show that allows kids to attend.
  • Competitor to the PRI?
    Will the PRI ever come back? Is this show a supplement to the PRI or is it more of a direct competitor?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT