City inks long-term deal with motorsports show

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Officials of the International Motorsports Industry Show and the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association announced an agreement Wednesday to keep the show in the city indefinitely.

The deal, which was initially signed for the years 2009 and 2010, was extended through 2015 in December. The latest agreement says the event will remain in Indianapolis for the life of the convention.

ICVA estimates the event generates more than $15.9 million in direct visitor spending for the city. Attendance for the inaugural show, held in December, topped 10,000. It also drew 345 exhibitors.

This year’s convention, set for Dec. 1-3, is expected to draw more than 20,000 visitors as well as 575 exhibitors.

“It is only fitting for the ‘Racing Capital of the World’ to permanently host the premier racing industry tradeshow, a show that brings together the entire global motorsports business,” ICVA President and CEO Don Welsh said in a prepared statement.

Indianapolis-based IMIS is owned by Tom Weisenbach, executive director of the Indiana Motorsports Association; Chris Paulsen, owner of C&R Racing Inc.; Jeff Stoops, president of Stoops Freightliner; and NASCAR driver and Indiana resident Tony Stewart.

“After shattering our projections for our inaugural show in 2009 and overwhelming positive feedback from attendees, we are confident in this deliberate decision to keep our show in Indianapolis,” Weisenbach said in a statement.

Indianapolis previously hosted a similar motorsports trade show, Performance Racing Industry Show, operated by a California-based group. Now held in Orlando, it was here until it outgrew the Indiana Convention Center in 2004.

A $275 million convention center expansion that will add 254,000 square feet of exhibit space is set to be finished in January.


  • Surpass
    I think it is amazing how fast the crew from IMIS was able to surpass the PRI show. In a short two years it has grown to almost overtake PRI and this year in sure itâ??s crowd will eclipse the Orlando PRI crowd. My company did GREAT Business there last year and we canâ??t wait till this year. Orlando is just another spinning wheel and hotrod show. IMIS is the true Motorsports Industry Show
  • Heading for bigger problems
    The ICVA should have waited until after the 2010 Show to cut any deal. The truth is the IMIS attendance list from last year had only 6,000 names on it...not 10,000. 70% were within a 4-hour drive of Indianapolis. People with international addresses were less than half a percent. Local racers and their friends drove in, walked the show in two to four hours, then drove home and didn't return for the second day. One day of attendance. And the IMIS expanded what is at best a one-day show to three days this year? They added another dead day? And they announced their raising rates next year? The IMIS is simply one of four racer consumer shows in Indianapolis in the off-season for local racers and their pals.
  • WTF?
    It says "NASCAR driver & Indiana resident Tony Stewart"... Ha! Tony lives in Mooresville, NC.
  • ?
    They must have made a typo: Indy IS racing? NO! Indy WAS racing. Sad but true.
  • Competitor to PRI?
    There is no competitor, I agree with James. PRI is the place to be if you want to do business.
  • Consumer Show
    No competitor. PRI is trade only. The Indy show is a consumer show that allows kids to attend.
  • Competitor to the PRI?
    Will the PRI ever come back? Is this show a supplement to the PRI or is it more of a direct competitor?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing