IBJNews

Illinois tax breaks could trigger demand for more

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Under the threat of losing thousands of jobs to other states, Illinois officials are on the verge of approving a tax-relief package meant to keep Sears and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange from leaving. Now they face another question: Who's next?

As state senators sent the tax package to the governor's desk Tuesday, economic development experts said other companies are likely to threaten to move as well unless Illinois offers them more financial goodies. More than 100 companies, including Deere & Co. and Abbott Laboratories, have incentive packages expiring in the next three years — and may want better deals.

Businesses thinking of moving to Illinois could demand even bigger incentives or play Illinois against other states in a bidding war, experts said.

"Once it becomes known that you're giving incentives, other companies are going to ask for them. Why wouldn't they?" said Judith Stallmann, a professor at the University of Missouri-Columbia who has studied economic development.

The tax package includes $100 million in incentives for Sears Holdings Corp. and CME Group Inc., which runs the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade. A smaller financial company, CBOE Holdings Inc., would also share in the tax relief.

CME Group Inc. talked to Indianapolis about moving its headquarters and about 1,700 high-playinbg jobs to central Indiana. Carmel also was likely a bidder for the company.

To help reduce anger over the aid for those companies, the package also includes roughly $120 million in more general tax breaks for all businesses and about $110 million in relief for poor and middle-class families.

The business measures passed the Illinois Senate 44-9. The cuts aimed at families passed 48-4. Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn supports the package.

Economic development experts said states often have little choice when major companies threaten to depart. Losing companies as prominent as Sears and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, particularly without making a bid to keep them, can be a major blow to a state's business reputation.

"When you think of Illinois, you think of both of these companies," said Tim Monger, former executive director if the Indiana Department of Commerce and part of a real estate brokerage that works with companies on site selection.

Illinois officials, even ones who support the tax relief package, acknowledge that more businesses are likely to come forward with their hands out. They say the requests will have to be considered one by one, at least in the short term. Down the road, Republicans and Democrats are likely to battle over cutting income taxes — which were increased in January — or making other changes designed to improve the state's overall business climate.

A site-selection consultant in Park Ridge said he's already hearing from businesses that feel neglected and want state help.

"One of the unintended consequences of this whole thing is you are going to see a lot more midsize businesses feeling like they're getting screwed by the state," said Brent Pollina. "They're carrying the tax burden. The state doesn't care about them at all."

Experts say generous incentive packages aren't particularly effective in creating new jobs or retaining old ones.

A paper by Stallmann, from the University of Missouri, notes one study found that only 10 percent of new jobs that are attributed to economic incentives actually were created by the incentives. Another study found that companies often don't hire as many people as they promised when the state aid was handed out.

In the case of Illinois, CME Group isn't promising to keep its operations in the state even if receives the tax cut.

Sears CEO Lou D'Ambrosio said in an email to employees that when the bill is signed into law the company will "cease the review of alternative locations and remain in Illinois where we have been located for nearly 125 years."

If Sears moved its Hoffman Estates headquarters to another state, Illinois would lose about 6,000 jobs. To prevent that, the tax legislation renews a credit the company has been getting for years, guaranteeing Sears a $15 million break on its taxes for the next decade.

Losing the CME's operations could cost Illinois about 2,000 jobs. Lawmakers agreed to cut taxes for the hugely profitable company by changing how much of its business is subject to state income taxes, reflecting the fact that many of its transactions now take place electronically and don't involve buyers or sellers in Illinois. Now CME and CBOE will pay taxes on 27.54 percent of their revenue, not 100 percent, saving them about $85 million a year.

Opponents of the tax package said Illinois should help all businesses by reversing the income tax increase passed by Democrats in January.

"Once again we're picking winners and losers," said Sen. Kyle McCarter, R-Lebanon. "These special deals are bad public policy. Essentially, if you can't hire a big-time lobbyist with connections, you don't get any of your money back from the tax increase."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Only The Little People Pay Taxes
    Report: 68 Fortune 500 Corporations Paying No State Income Tax

    The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy and Citizens for Tax Justice study, "Corporate Tax Dodging in the Fifty States", lists 68 Fortune 500 companies that managed to pay no state income tax at all in at least one year during the period from 2008 through 2010 despite posting a total of nearly $117 billion in pre-tax U.S. profits during those no-tax years.

    http://dirtdiggersdigest.org/archives/2645

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT