IBJNews

Indiana BMV lowering license fees after lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles announced Friday it was cutting fees for driver's licenses, determining after being sued over the charges that it had miscalculated them.

The lawyer who filed the class-action lawsuit against the BMV, Irwin Levin, said he welcomed the agency's action, but believes it should also refund some $30 million collected since 2007.

Fees for standard operator's licenses were cut by $3.50 effective immediately on Friday, BMV spokesman Josh Gillespie said. The new fees will range from $17.50 for a six-year license to $14.50 for a four-year license — a maximum reduction of about 19 percent.

Gillespie said no action has been taken on any refunds and that he couldn't comment further on that possibility because of the pending lawsuit.

"The initial action right now is to lower the prices," Gillespie said. "That is not part of the lawsuit. We did that on our own because of our own calculations."

Lawyers for the BMV acknowledged in a court filing last month that it "may have inadvertently" overcharged drivers for licenses.

Levin, an Indianapolis lawyer, filed the lawsuit in March alleging that drivers under age 75 were charged between $4 and $7 more for each license than allowed by state law.

He said Friday he still believed the lower fees set by the BMV are too high and that he was in mediation sessions with the state on a possible resolution.

"I'm happy that they're charging people less of the illegal amount than they were, but they now need to pay everybody back through the court system so that there's transparency," he said.

A spokesman for the state attorney general's office, which is representing the BMV, declined to comment about the status of the lawsuit.

More than 2 million of the state's 4 million drivers renewed their licenses in Indiana last year, according to the lawsuit that a Marion County judge granted class-action status in May.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • One way to remove a deficit
    Is to charge more than allowed. Don't think for a minute that the people in charge in 2007 didn't know they were charging more than allowed, and they got away with it until now. $30 million over 5 years, interest free..nice grab Daniels Administration. Giving $100 back doesn't reach all effected....and it was illegal, that is the issue.
  • Oh Yea
    Iforgot, Not your man Mitch gave you $100.00 back in state taxes, so if he did money-grabb from you, you got it back. Think before you speak.
    • Thanks Mitch
      Yet another Mitch Daniels money-grabbing move thrown out. Too bad we all sat around and let him do it.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

      2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

      3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

      4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

      5. Oh wait. Never mind.

      ADVERTISEMENT