IBJNews

Indiana BMV lowering license fees after lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles announced Friday it was cutting fees for driver's licenses, determining after being sued over the charges that it had miscalculated them.

The lawyer who filed the class-action lawsuit against the BMV, Irwin Levin, said he welcomed the agency's action, but believes it should also refund some $30 million collected since 2007.

Fees for standard operator's licenses were cut by $3.50 effective immediately on Friday, BMV spokesman Josh Gillespie said. The new fees will range from $17.50 for a six-year license to $14.50 for a four-year license — a maximum reduction of about 19 percent.

Gillespie said no action has been taken on any refunds and that he couldn't comment further on that possibility because of the pending lawsuit.

"The initial action right now is to lower the prices," Gillespie said. "That is not part of the lawsuit. We did that on our own because of our own calculations."

Lawyers for the BMV acknowledged in a court filing last month that it "may have inadvertently" overcharged drivers for licenses.

Levin, an Indianapolis lawyer, filed the lawsuit in March alleging that drivers under age 75 were charged between $4 and $7 more for each license than allowed by state law.

He said Friday he still believed the lower fees set by the BMV are too high and that he was in mediation sessions with the state on a possible resolution.

"I'm happy that they're charging people less of the illegal amount than they were, but they now need to pay everybody back through the court system so that there's transparency," he said.

A spokesman for the state attorney general's office, which is representing the BMV, declined to comment about the status of the lawsuit.

More than 2 million of the state's 4 million drivers renewed their licenses in Indiana last year, according to the lawsuit that a Marion County judge granted class-action status in May.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • One way to remove a deficit
    Is to charge more than allowed. Don't think for a minute that the people in charge in 2007 didn't know they were charging more than allowed, and they got away with it until now. $30 million over 5 years, interest free..nice grab Daniels Administration. Giving $100 back doesn't reach all effected....and it was illegal, that is the issue.
  • Oh Yea
    Iforgot, Not your man Mitch gave you $100.00 back in state taxes, so if he did money-grabb from you, you got it back. Think before you speak.
    • Thanks Mitch
      Yet another Mitch Daniels money-grabbing move thrown out. Too bad we all sat around and let him do it.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

      2. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

      3. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

      4. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

      5. There is no developer on the planet that isn't aware of what their subcontractors are doing (or not doing). They hire construction superintendents. They have architects and engineers on site to observe construction progress. If your subcontractor wasn't doing their job, you fire them and find someone who will. If people wonder why more condos aren't being built, developers like Kosene & Kosene are the reason. I am glad the residents were on the winning end after a long battle.

      ADVERTISEMENT