Indiana House OKs bill limiting teacher contracts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House on Friday approved a bill prohibiting contracts between school districts and teachers unions from including anything other than wages and wage-related benefits.

The Republican-controlled House voted 52-40 largely along party lines in favor of the bill, which is part of GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels' aggressive education agenda.

The proposal would put the limits on contract agreements between local districts and unions representing teachers and any other school employees, such as bus drivers, custodians and nurses, starting in July.

Supporters say teacher contracts shouldn't include details that do little to improve academics, such as requiring comfortable teachers' lounges.

Rep. Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, said the collective bargaining limits were aimed at giving school administrators and school boards the flexibility to make decisions on running the districts without being bound by contract clauses that sometimes have been around for decades.

"We're allowing a coach to come in and do what we want — take the team across the finish line — without tying their arms around their back," said Behning, who is chairman of the House Education Committee. "What this bill does is provide the opportunity for educational leaders to lead."

Leaders of the Indiana State Teachers Association, the state's largest teachers union, have argued against the bargaining restrictions, saying that the contracts are negotiated locally and that school district leaders must agree to any provisions.

More than 1,000 teachers attended a Statehouse rally in February denouncing the bargaining limits, along with Republican-backed proposals to tie teacher salaries with student performance and create vouchers that would direct taxpayer money to private schools.

Democrats argued during Friday's debate that the bill would give too much control to school administrators over issues such as the school calendar, class sizes, hiring and evaluation procedures.

Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis, said he believed the bill was aimed at limiting the influence of the teachers unions and showed a lack of respect for teachers.

"Their work environment is the learning environment of our children, our grandchildren, our nieces, our nephews," he said.

Six Republican House members joined all Democrats present in voting against the bill.

The Senate already has approved a similar version of the bill, but agreement on a single version must still be reached before it goes to the governor.

The House-passed proposal would allow school districts to agree on new teacher union contracts with provisions beyond wages and benefits until July 1. Those new contracts wouldn't be allowed to extend beyond June 2013.


  • teacher contracts
    here we go again lets do what the governor wants, not what is best for the people teaching our kids. primary time is near lets get rid of puppets that can"t do what we voted them to do.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?