Indiana municipal bonds are faring well

June 26, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

The “Investing” column of June 14, “Municipal bond defaults might be next crisis,” raises some valid points, but portrays municipal bonds in such a manner that is too general. Further, investors in Indiana bonds should take comfort in the absence of credit-crisis situations.

I am squarely with Skarbeck in his concerns about the growth of pension obligations, but I would add other post-employment benefit obligations, such as retiree insurance and health care. The realities of these commitments need to be in our headlines, and they need to be a focus of taxpayers and public leaders across the country. The growing price tag of the commitments to retirees is a looming cloud for a number of states and local governments, while many governors, treasurers, fiscal administrators and legislative bodies are out in front of this and have been for some time.

Several examples of challenged credits—such as Harrisburg, Pa., and Jefferson County, Ala.—are cited [as having] municipal bond defaults. These issuers, and others scattered across the country, each have their own, unique set of circumstances. In certain cases, the credit concerns have gone unaddressed, lingering and building for nearly a decade. In a number of situations, little digging is required to uncover a sequence of managerial and/or legislative missteps. Strong fiscal management and sound decision-making help avoid the path that leads to crisis situations, such as the consideration of bankruptcy-filing or receivership.

In Indiana, we are fortunate to have no such troubled credits, nor are there any that seem to be heading in that direction. In fact, our state’s general creditworthiness is holding up well, and there is acknowledgment of how the state is responding to economically sensitive revenue volatility.

At the local level—cities, towns, special districts and counties—there is belt-tightening, to be sure. We’re also hearing about school corporations’ budget trimming and, in some cases, program cuts. We need to keep in mind that Indiana local entities are still working through the implementation of property tax reforms. Even with the existing set of fiscal issues, the creditworthiness of state and local Indiana bond issues tends to be relatively strong.

Skarbeck wisely advises municipal bond investors to be vigilant in their credit analysis and understanding of what they are holding or considering for investment. Each municipal bond credit is its own story. In Indiana, our stories are good—even encouraging—relative to how some credits are performing in other parts of the country.

Kevin D. Taylor
Executive vice president, public finance
City Securities Corp.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.