IBJNews

Indianapolis law firms raising rates again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Recession’s over. Time for law firms to get cracking on raising rates.

Firms don’t dare demand the 6-percent to 8-percent increases they enjoyed before the recession. Corporate clients with little wriggle room to ratchet up their own prices are in no mood for bigger bills.

Law firms can, however, shoot for middle ground. And they are.

An IBJ survey of the largest firms in Indianapolis shows that most plan to charge as much as 3 percent more this year.

The intentions, which come at a time when inflation is virtually nonexistent, nevertheless are in line with findings of a national survey late last year by Altman Weil Inc., a suburban Philadelphia consultant to law firms.

Many firms held the line or even cut prices during the recession, Altman Principal Tom Clay noted.

“This is an attempt to start to make up some of that ground.”

IBJ polled the top-10 firms in Indianapolis, measured by number of attorneys, to determine how many raised rates this year and by how much. Six managing partners responded, indicating their increases largely were lower than, or in line with, the Altman Weil findings.

Toby McClamroch, who has been managing partner of Bingham McHale LLP for five years, said his firm raised rates about 3 percent. But McClamroch added that clients have grown extremely sensitive.

“We spend more time openly discussing rates and invoicing issues with clients than we ever have,” he said.

Client perceptions are tempering rate increases at the Indianapolis office of Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius Hollister LLP. The local office hiked fees an average of just 1 percent in 2009 and 1.5 percent this year, Managing Partner Robert Hicks said.

“We did not want to be perceived in any way, shape or form as jumping on our clients who may be struggling with the economic conditions,” Hicks said.

Other firms were less forthcoming about the traditionally taboo topic of rates. Barnes & Thornburg LLP and Ice Miller LLP—two of the city’s largest law firms—declined to participate.

“Any information concerning our rates or other such issues are internal business matters and we prefer to communicate directly with our clients about such matters,” an Ice Miller spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail.

Krieg DeVault LLP and Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman PC also chose not to take part.

Across-the-board raises rare

Lawyers command greater fees as their experience rises. Associates at larger Indianapolis law firms typically charge $150 to $200 an hour, though prices range as low as $130 to as high as $220.

Partners earn more—usually $200 to $350 an hour, although the fee can rise for high-profile lawyers or for counsel involving complex litigation.

In this economy, it’s more difficult to justify raising rates for partners already at the upper end of the pay scale, several managing partners said. They instead instituted rate increases at the associate level, which likely were easier for clients to swallow.

Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson & Feary has resisted raising compensation for its most senior partners since the end of 2008, Managing Partner Greg Feary said.

“Clearly, when you’re talking about your highest rates,” he said, “that’s where the greatest sensitivity would be.”

At the other end of the spectrum, Baker & Daniels Managing Partner Tom Froehle is equally sensitive about raising fees for new associates. Their rate has remained unchanged for three years. Partners, meanwhile, are given more discretion in deciding what they should charge, though many have conceded that, for now, their rates can’t move higher, Froehle said.

“There’s no question that there’s a concern [among clients] about brand-new lawyers making a ton of money,” he said.

So Baker & Daniels’ fee increase, which evens out to about 3 percent, is most evident among experienced associates, Froehle said.

Bose McKinney & Evans has taken a similar approach. Hourly rates for starting associates stayed the same, while those ascending to partner earned a rate increase of nearly 3 percent, Managing Partner Jeff Gaither said. He assumed leadership of the firm in March after spending 27 years as a business litigator.

The rate hike is less than the 5-percent annual increase Bose McKinney might normally command. Still, one large client proposed receiving a discounted rate if it committed to at least $1 million in legal fees.

Did Gaither acquiesce?

“We reached an agreement that both sides are comfortable with,” he said.

Alternative fees gain steam

Hourly rates have been a staple among Indianapolis law firms, both large and small, for decades. Yet firm leaders are slowly accepting alternative fees for certain types of practice areas.

The most common example is a flat fee in which clients are charged a set amount up front rather than receiving an estimate that could be much larger once the work is finished.

Most firms are embracing flat fees for legal work that involves a large amount of repetition, such as estate planning, so it’s simpler to gauge how many hours might be necessary.

Local legal consultant Bob Birge is a big advocate of alternative fees, arguing that firms that continue to avoid the progressive billing run the risk of losing business to competitors more willing to embrace it.

“As long as the economy remains floundering, clients will be looking for some sort of relief from their lawyers,” he said. “The use of alternative fees may be both fiscally responsible, as well as responsive to your client.”

In fact, Birge contends that alternative fees, if used properly, can produce more revenue for law firms than traditional hourly billing.

The Indianapolis office of Frost Brown Todd LLC held its hourly rates steady in 2009 and raised them about 3 percent this year, Managing Partner Nelson Alexander said.

Even so, the firm is evaluating the use of alternative fees as aggressively as its clients are requesting them.

“Let’s be honest, law firms are in the service business,” Alexander said. “We have to continually modify our business value to suit our client base.”

Feary at Scopelitis concurred. He likened client requests for flat fees to consumers shopping for the best deal on a new automobile.

“When you walk on a car lot, do you feel more empowered as a buyer than ever before?” Feary asked. “It runs across all markets and segments. Bargaining with lawyers is not really going to be an exception.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • graveyard fact!
    why do they bury lawyers 12ft deep instead of the normal 6ft when they die? Cause deep down they are good people!
  • So expensive!
    I paid a good estate lawyer in my parents' hometown 1/2 of what it would have cost me here Indy. Why such a difference?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT