IBJNews

Area hospital construction taking break after expensive binge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A truce of sorts in the hospital arms race is upon us.

Economic factors have forced Indianapolis-area hospitals to stop battling one another with big guns—the inpatient hospital expansions that thudded into place around the city the past decade. Local observers expect no additional inpatient facilities for at least five years—maybe longer.

Nevertheless, they do expect local hospitals, both large and small, to wage a firefight with their equivalent of smaller arms—outpatient clinics and surgery centers.

“The need for inpatient beds—I think five years from now, we’ll need half as many as we have now,” said Kevin Speer, chief strategy officer for St. Vincent Health.

Hospital building affects not only local construction employment, but also the cost of health insurance for employers and individuals.

More supply of hospital services typically induces more use of them, according to decades of research by Dr. Jack Wennberg at the Dartmouth Medical School. The extra spending on health care services means health insurers have to raise premiums to cover the higher costs.

It’s hard to find a hospital executive who disagrees with Wennberg’s findings. But they keep erecting new facilities in the wealthy suburbs in a quest to attract patients with employer-sponsored insurance, which pays at rates high enough to offset money-losing customers insured by government programs.

This suburban warfare raged all around Indianapolis the past 10 years, with area hospitals adding more than 900 staffed, inpatient beds, according to IBJ research. That’s a 17-percent increase locally compared with a 2.6-percent decrease across the country, according to data from the American Hospital Association.

Before the building boom, the Indianapolis area already had slightly more hospital beds per person than the national average.

“They’re essentially following population growth that’s pretty well-heeled,” said John Snell, an Indianapolis real estate evaluation agent.

The extra beds came as part of entirely new hospitals, such as the St. Vincent Heart Center, the Indiana Heart Hospital, the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, and the Clarian West and North medical centers.

There also were major expansions of Community North Hospital, Indiana University Hospital, the St. Francis Mooresville Hospital and Riverview Hospital.

The increase was fueled by easy credit and historically low rates on bonds and other forms of borrowing.

Not everyone is taking as drastic a view as Speer at St. Vincent—otherwise Community Health Network would have reconsidered the $130 million expansion of its Community South Hospital, which will add 40 beds to that campus.

Also, Clarian would not have restarted construction on its 44-bed Saxony facility near Fishers. The $190 million hospital will be similar to the Clarian North hospital in Carmel, which opened in 2005 and has yet to post a profit.

The losses at Clarian North have made Clarian and its peers more cautious about the speculative building they did in the previous decade, said Shawn Mulholland, director of business development at BSA LifeStructures, a health care design firm in Indianapolis. It also has led hospitals to spend far more time calculating potential return on investment, not merely whether they can afford the debt service on a new project.

“It’s forced hospitals to be much more disciplined in their capital expenditures,” Mulholland said.

Bond collapse

The source of these changes dates to the collapse of the auction-rate bond markets in spring of 2008. Rates on hospital bonds soared, doubling for borrowers with less-than-perfect credit ratings.

Those rates have come back down now, but bond buyers, banks and even hospital boards are far less willing to see a hospital add debt—just in case there’s another unforeseen financial shock.

In the past decade, hospitals financed many building projects using gains on their large investment portfolios. But the meltdown on Wall Street hammered investment portfolios, and they have yet to fully recover.

Meanwhile, a generation-long trend toward outpatient services is accelerating.

An outpatient procedure is anything where a patient stays at a hospital facility less than 24 hours. Outpatient services account for one-half to two-thirds of hospitals’ revenue, which is true for large systems like Clarian as well as small ones like Riverview.

Increasingly, outpatient procedures are not even performed in the massive hospitals themselves, but in smaller, clinic-like buildings or in physician offices. These smaller buildings are often attached to an inpatient hospital, but they can stand on their own, conveniently placed near the most popular strip malls.

Outpatient is picking up steam again because new technology continues to turn surgeries and procedures that once required overnight stays into minimal-impact affairs where patients go home the same day. In addition, shifts in federal reimbursement rates continue to favor outpatient procedures over inpatient ones.

On top of those two trends, physicians—the driving force behind many of the new hospitals of the previous decade—will be generally banned from investing in new hospitals by provisions in the health care reform bills pending before Congress.

“They will make the business model so unattractive” for physician-only ventures, Mulholland said. “What that might do is force the physicians to develop partnerships with the hospitals.”

But health reform will increase the number of people with insurance coverage (read: paying customers), so demand for health care services will likely grow.

Hospitals may also need to tear down and replace aging facilities. That’s essentially what Wishard Health Services will do by replacing its 353-bed complex at 10th Street and Indiana Avenue with a 303-bed hospital just west of the IUPUI campus. The new hospital is scheduled to open in December 2013.

St. Francis Hospital & Health Centers is also expanding its campus near Interstate 65 and Emerson Road before it abandons its aging hospital in Beech Grove.

Otherwise, however, the action will be elsewhere.

Lingering hot spots

So where are the likeliest places health care facilities might be built?

The most obvious answer is where the hospital systems already have land.

Sometimes that means hospitals could add new services on excess land surrounding existing facilities. That’s what Community Health is already doing at its campus along County Line Road in the southernmost part of Marion County. Community used the same strategy on its campus in Castleton, where it opened the Indiana Heart Hospital in 2003 and a massive expansion to its North hospital in 2007.

St. Vincent has the ability to do similar expansions, if it wishes—this around a free-standing emergency room, outpatient surgery and other services at Exit 10 off Interstate 69, near the Clarian Saxony hospital.

Clarian, too, has committed only to building the first phase of its hospital project, and has most of a 96-acre parcel where more could be added.

On the same road as the St. Vincent and Clarian facilities, Community Health has a physician office building and, a few miles south, Hancock Regional Hospital is opening a physician office and imaging facility.

Near Zionsville, Witham Health Services is moving to acquire the eight-acre parcel on which it built a free-standing emergency room and imaging facility in the Anson development. That leaves room to add services—if residential developments grow enough to demand it.

In Avon and Carmel, Clarian has extra land that could be used for further development on the campuses of its Clarian West Medical Center and its Clarian North Medical Center.

The other way hospitals could expand is on land they have bought speculatively.

The most active hospital on this front has been Clarian. It owns sizable pieces of land at 146th Street and Hazel Dell Parkway in Carmel that it now wants to sell, said Abbe Hohmann, senior vice president at the Indianapolis office of St. Louis-based Colliers Turley Martin Tucker. Clarian also owns a 158-acre parcel at the southwest corner of State Road 135 and Whiteland Road near Bargersville.

Also, Danville-based Hendricks Regional Hospital holds a 90-acre parcel in Avon available for further expansion. The hospital is already nearing completion on a $60 million, 37-bed addition to its Danville hospital.

“They would look to their own land. That’s just common sense,” Hohmann said. She added, “All of the larger health care providers—St. Vincent, Clarian, Community, Hendricks Regional—they all continue to have needs as the demands for health care delivery continue.”

Other alternatives

If hospitals don’t buy and develop land on their own, look for them to locate along major, untapped corridors of the city, said Deeni Taylor, executive vice president at developer BremnerDuke Health Care Real Estate.

“We usually see it following rooftops and retail,” Taylor said of outpatient medical developments.

On the southern edge of the city, that means anything along U.S. 31 or I-65. To the west, the key roads are U.S. 36, the Ronald Reagan Parkway and whichever roads around the new airport terminal become most traveled.

To the north, Taylor sees potential for growth along I-65 near Zionsville or along U.S. 31 in Westfield. Otherwise, he expects activity along east-west routes, such as 146th Street, since U.S. 31 and I-69 already have an abundance of medical development.

Town leaders in Fishers unveiled plans in October for a medical technology corridor on a strip of land running along 136th Street west of the cluster of medical development at Exit 10.

Not everyone thinks the corridor will be able to duplicate the major hospitals and medical offices along U.S. 31 in Carmel. But hospitals are still battling one another with smaller developments, which Fishers would be in a good position to chase.

“We are seeing a pickup,” Taylor said. “This health reform thing is clearer and because they will be covering more people and taking care of more patients, they have to turn loose on some of their projects.” •

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT