IBJNews

IPL sues engineering consultant over Eagle Valley discharge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indianapolis Power and Light Co. is suing its engineering consultant over an industrial accident that spilled 30 million gallons of polluted water into White River.

IPL, a subsidiary of Arlington, Va.-based AES Corp., operates a 344-megawatt coal-fired power plant called the Eagle Valley Generating Station in Morgan County. Once burned, the coal turns to ash, which is then removed from the plant through a system of movable water pipes and discharged into five retaining ponds.

IDEM fined IPL after a pair of spills from its Eagle Valley plant. (IBJ File Photo)

According to its federal lawsuit, filed Jan. 29, as well as Indiana Department of Environmental Management records, Eagle Valley’s ponds are contained by a system of dikes. But on Feb. 14, 2007, one of the dikes breeched, releasing liquid ash effluent onto IPL’s property and ultimately into the adjacent White River.

IPL alleges it hired Lexington, Ky.-based Fuller Mossbarger Scott and May Engineers Inc. to examine the breech, supervise its repair, and improve Eagle Valley’s dike system to avoid future accidents. According to documents included in the suit, IPL paid its consultant $45,500 for the job.

But on Jan. 30, 2008, Eagle Valley’s dike system failed again, according to its lawsuit. IDEM investigated both incidents, and found the second levee breech occurred in the same location as the first.

IDEM assessed IPL a $23,800 civil penalty. It also required IPALCO to study the site, submit its findings to IDEM, implement repairs, and follow up with regular inspections. If IPL fails to comply with IDEM’s time line, it’s subject to $500-per-week penalties.

IPL’s federal lawsuit against Fuller Mossbarger Scott and May Engineers—which was acquired in 2008 by Alberta, Canada-based Santec Inc.—attempts to assign responsibility and liability for the second spill to the engineering consultant. IPL seeks compensatory damages, as well as the costs and fines it incurred responding to the second effluent spill.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT