IBJNews

IPS says it must cut $27 million from budget

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Public Schools said Thursday it will need to cut $27 million from its 2012-13 budget due to declines in state funding and local income restrained by property-tax caps.

The cuts represent about 5 percent of the school system's current budget. IPS Superintendent Eugene White said he will detail his spending-reduction plan on May 24 at the IPS central office building.

In a statement released Thursday afternoon, IPS officials said they would cut staff and find savings in contracts for supplies and services, such as bank fees, professional services charges and travel expenses.

IPS emphasized no cuts would be made in art, music and physical education programs.

"IPS has pledged to keep cuts as far away from the classroom as possible, and this budget proposal does that," White said in a prepared statement. He added, “We've cut administrators, secretarial staff and police officers to ensure our classrooms have the funds they need to provide a quality education to our students."

IPS said it has cut its general fund budget by $120 million over the past five years as its enrollment as steadily declined and the state government chopped per-student funding in 2010 and 2011.

The district is still the state’s largest, with nearly 32,000 students, but that's down more than 5,000 students from five years ago. Its budget this year totaled about $540 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 540 million for 32,000 -- $16,875 a student

    Wow....how can this article be correct. At $16,875 a student a school year???? 540,000,000 dollars / 32,000 students = $16,854 a student a year!! I would like to see the cost per student for "normal" against the cost per student in "special needs". Are we spending too much for mandated "special needs" while underfunding students that would otherwise have a chance to become productive citizens? How much money is being (invested/squandered) for costly education given to illegal residents that our working-citizen-hating government requires taxpayers to fund?

    Before one can make any decision, we need more, much more information.

    Dupree
  • Why bother?
    Why bother coming to the public meeting? According to White's comments Tuesday night, it doesn't matter what the public thinks because it's already a done deal. They'll also be voting on the cuts the Tuesday before the public meeting.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT