IBJNews

IPS says it must cut $27 million from budget

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Public Schools said Thursday it will need to cut $27 million from its 2012-13 budget due to declines in state funding and local income restrained by property-tax caps.

The cuts represent about 5 percent of the school system's current budget. IPS Superintendent Eugene White said he will detail his spending-reduction plan on May 24 at the IPS central office building.

In a statement released Thursday afternoon, IPS officials said they would cut staff and find savings in contracts for supplies and services, such as bank fees, professional services charges and travel expenses.

IPS emphasized no cuts would be made in art, music and physical education programs.

"IPS has pledged to keep cuts as far away from the classroom as possible, and this budget proposal does that," White said in a prepared statement. He added, “We've cut administrators, secretarial staff and police officers to ensure our classrooms have the funds they need to provide a quality education to our students."

IPS said it has cut its general fund budget by $120 million over the past five years as its enrollment as steadily declined and the state government chopped per-student funding in 2010 and 2011.

The district is still the state’s largest, with nearly 32,000 students, but that's down more than 5,000 students from five years ago. Its budget this year totaled about $540 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 540 million for 32,000 -- $16,875 a student

    Wow....how can this article be correct. At $16,875 a student a school year???? 540,000,000 dollars / 32,000 students = $16,854 a student a year!! I would like to see the cost per student for "normal" against the cost per student in "special needs". Are we spending too much for mandated "special needs" while underfunding students that would otherwise have a chance to become productive citizens? How much money is being (invested/squandered) for costly education given to illegal residents that our working-citizen-hating government requires taxpayers to fund?

    Before one can make any decision, we need more, much more information.

    Dupree
  • Why bother?
    Why bother coming to the public meeting? According to White's comments Tuesday night, it doesn't matter what the public thinks because it's already a done deal. They'll also be voting on the cuts the Tuesday before the public meeting.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT