ITT, Corinthian face consumer bureau probe over lending

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is investigating at least two for-profit colleges, including ITT Educational Services Inc., over potentially abusive practices in marketing and originating student loans.

The CFPB, which is studying and preparing to directly supervise the entire private student loan industry, is examining potential illegal practices by Corinthian Colleges Inc. and Carmel-based ITT, according a document posted on the agency’s website and securities filings.

The CFPB is looking into whether for-profit educational firms “have engaged or are engaging in unlawful acts or practices relating to the advertising, marketing, or origination of private student loans,” according to the document.

Richard Cordray, the CFPB’s director, has vowed to focus on the private student loan industry as the total U.S. student debt burden, which is overwhelmingly government credit, has surpassed $1 trillion. One area of interest is student loan refinancing.

“Many consumers seek to negotiate for a more affordable payment plan on their loan obligations, only to find themselves stymied, even when a modification would make sense for all concerned,” Cordray said on Feb. 20.

The CFPB has proposed a regulation to supervise major non- bank student lenders. It already supervises banks with assets above $10 billion.

Corinthian Colleges, based in Santa Clara, Calif., received a request for information, called a civil investigative demand, from the bureau on Sept. 13, the company said in a Nov. 6 securities filing. Corinthian said in the filing that it “believes that its acts and practices relating to student loans are lawful and essential.”

The document on the CFPB website is an objection from Corinthian to the scope of the agency’s demand for information from the company. Attorneys for Bloomberg News wrote a letter on June 28 arguing that the CFPB was failing to abide by its own disclosure rules by withholding such documents.

ITT said on Oct. 29 that it had received a second demand for information from CFPB about “private education loans made to our students and certain other aspects of our business.” The demand replaced a similar one from earlier this year, ITT said.

Kent Jenkins, a spokesman for Corinthian, declined to comment. ITT didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.