IBJNews

IUPUI to move men's hoops to fairgrounds Coliseum

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The IUPUI men’s basketball program will begin hosting its home games in the Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum in its 2014-15 season, after the facility undergoes a 22-month, $63 million renovation.

School and fairgrounds officials announced the five-year deal Thursday at the Coliseum.

"This is truly coming back to the future," said IUPUI Chancellor Charles R. Bantz, noting that IUPUI played in the Coliseum in the 1970s. "This is a huge step forward for our program."

IUPUI called the Coliseum home intermittently between 1975 and 1979. The Div. I team currently plays its games in the IUPUI Gymnasium, nicknamed The Jungle. Located at 901 W. New York St., the gym seats about 1,215.

Renovation of the 74-year-old Coliseum began last year and is expected to end in mid-2014. Upon completion, the Coliseum will seat 6,841 guests for basketball and include fully renovated locker rooms, a suspended state-of-the-art ribbon video board, and hospitality options throughout fully updated concourses.

IUPUI will have a team store in the Coliseum, providing another revenue stream for the fairgrounds and the athletic program. The school also will have the option of playing some women's basketball games at the Coliseum.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • You're right
    IUPUI is not Louisville thank God!
  • whoops
    *now I'm sure IUPUI is NOT comparable
  • U of L and UK
    UofL still play all their games off campus at a state of the art downtown arena. The University of Kentucky also plays all their games of campus at a downtown arena which is about to get about 300 million in upgrades--now I'm sure IUPUI is a comparable to these 2 schools but they do play off campus.
    • spaces
      At IUPUI I would assume that that far more students drive to class than walk. As bad as parking is on campus few would come down there to watch a basketball game. Getting students without a car to the fairgrounds is an easier task than getting students with a car to campus.
    • Good one, John Coleman
      John Coleman - I can't believe I have to explain this, but IUPUI is not Louisville. Lest you are offended with my response, you brought it up, Pal.
      • Spend, Spend, Spend!
        OK, so the state shells out millions to rehab an obsolete building and then finds an accomplice in yet another taxpayer funded customer with no accountability to help pay for it. Once again, Indiana's taxpayers foot the bill for officially sanctioned stupidity. Look around, Indiana. The state is 44th in unemployment. The city is full of empty homes. You can pretend all you want. We are failing dramatically.
      • Good Move
        I think that this is the best thing that has happened to the program in some time. This will help them establish more of a fan base with northside residents as well as draw fans from Hamilton County. Remember that U of L Cardinals also played all of their games until recently off-campus at the state fairgrounds in Louisville.
        • Better than the alternative
          I agree the venue will be way too large at this point but it sure beats playing in a middle school'esque gym. Lets be honest, sports just aren't the focus of IUPUI, maybe that is a good thing in terms of what the students are paying for when they come to campus - education.
        • IPFW
          Funny how IPFW is moving there home games back to campus.
        • Address the real problem
          IUPUI needs to address the real problem and that's the facilities on campus are dated and need an overhaul. Build something on campus. How many years since the jungle has had any major improvements? This campus could be the ultimate urban campus for the modern college of the future.
        • Hmmm
          I'm glad the coliseum will have a tenant but I wonder if this was a solution without a problem for IUPUI. I've limited experience going to Jaguar games but it was never packed when I did go. I can't imagine they really need the extra space the coliseum provides. Additionally, this is not convenient for students, especially those without a car. I do think it will help with recruiting and perception as their current home was smaller than many high school gyms around the state. Perhaps it will provide a goldfish-type effect and they will grow to fill their new tank.
          • Cavernous
            That is going to be one big empty building for a while...if it helps build a fan base and recruiting to play there then great...but it is mighty roomy for Jaguars right now.

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
           
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

          2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

          3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

          4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

          5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

          ADVERTISEMENT