IBJNews

Jay stepping down as CEO of TechPoint

 IBJ Staff
September 24, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Jim Jay, president and CEO of statewide technology advocacy group TechPoint for the past six years, is stepping down to take a job in the private sector.

Jay, 43, is leaving the Indianapolis-based organization to become chairman, president and CEO of San Diego-based Vinculum Communication Inc., he said Sunday in a letter announcing the move to TechPoint board members.

He will remain at TechPoint through Oct. 31, he said.

"While Vinculum is based in San Diego, I will remain based in Indianapolis," Jay said in the letter. "The company generates $40 million a year in revenue and has been funded by several central Indiana investors, including me. This opportunity will allow me tap my own entrepreneurial desires. "

Jay joined TechPoint in 2004 as chief operating officer and replaced Cameron Carter as CEO in late 2006.
 
The state's best-known technology promotional group, TechPoint was formed in 2002 when the former Indiana Information Technology Association merged with the Indiana Technology Partnership. The group is part of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, which includes economic growth initiatives BioCrossroads, Conexus Indiana, Energy Systems Network and Indy Partnership.

“Under Jim’s leadership, TechPoint has truly become the voice of Indiana’s technology sector,” said TechPoint Chairman Mark Hill in a prepared statement. “He’s focused on the issues that matter to tech employers, investors and entrepreneurs – workforce development, access to capital, a pro-innovation public policy agenda and more.”

Jay also is managing director of HALO Capital Group, an early-stage funding group directed by TechPoint that makes seed investments between $250,000 to $2 million to Indiana based companies. The group has invested more than $19 million in 14 companies in the past four years.

CICP and TechPoint leaders said Monday morning that they have begun a search process for Jay's successor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT