IBJNews

Judge approves legal fees in Fair Finance case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A U.S. bankruptcy judge in Ohio has approved payment of $1.7 million in legal fees and expenses to lawyers working on the massive fraud case involving indicted Indianapolis financier Tim Durham.

Chief Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum signed off on the payout Tuesday morning, according to the Akron Beacon Journal.

The amount paid to lawyers so far nearly accounts for the entire $1.8 million that Fair Finance trustee Brian Bash has recovered so far.  Bash has said he expects to recover $78.5 million more of the estimated $230 million that investors lost to Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co.’s alleged Ponzi scheme.

Bash’s Cleveland law firm, Baker Hostetler, accounts for the largest part of the $1.7 million in professional fees, which were submitted for approval last month.

Durham bought Fair Finance in 2002 and used it to orchestrate the largest Ponzi scheme in state history, Bash alleges. Durham and business partners James Cochran and Rick Snow were arrested March 16 after being indicted on 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud.

The three have pleaded not guilty.
 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • All $$ Collected
    What do you bet that the lawyers will get 99.9% of all the money collected over the course of this long process. What a JOKE! Now who are the criminals?
  • where?
    article seems incomplete. where is he going to get 78 million if he only has 2 after a years work?
  • Surprised?
    And the shareholders get screwed again. As long as the lawyers can make their Sea-Ray payments, who cares?
  • Why not wait?
    Seems like they would wait until the $78.5M is recovered before paying these legal fees.
  • $75m?
    Lampoon is insolvent and the royalties are where? Not being accounted for in the whooping $2m gross revenue last year. NO value there or the only operating place--united trailer

    Trustee is almost as bad as Timmy
  • gosh
    That was predictable, I am surprised they left 100k on the table for the poor Amish folks.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT