IBJNews

Judge approves legal fees in Fair Finance case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A U.S. bankruptcy judge in Ohio has approved payment of $1.7 million in legal fees and expenses to lawyers working on the massive fraud case involving indicted Indianapolis financier Tim Durham.

Chief Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum signed off on the payout Tuesday morning, according to the Akron Beacon Journal.

The amount paid to lawyers so far nearly accounts for the entire $1.8 million that Fair Finance trustee Brian Bash has recovered so far.  Bash has said he expects to recover $78.5 million more of the estimated $230 million that investors lost to Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co.’s alleged Ponzi scheme.

Bash’s Cleveland law firm, Baker Hostetler, accounts for the largest part of the $1.7 million in professional fees, which were submitted for approval last month.

Durham bought Fair Finance in 2002 and used it to orchestrate the largest Ponzi scheme in state history, Bash alleges. Durham and business partners James Cochran and Rick Snow were arrested March 16 after being indicted on 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud.

The three have pleaded not guilty.
 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • All $$ Collected
    What do you bet that the lawyers will get 99.9% of all the money collected over the course of this long process. What a JOKE! Now who are the criminals?
  • where?
    article seems incomplete. where is he going to get 78 million if he only has 2 after a years work?
  • Surprised?
    And the shareholders get screwed again. As long as the lawyers can make their Sea-Ray payments, who cares?
  • Why not wait?
    Seems like they would wait until the $78.5M is recovered before paying these legal fees.
  • $75m?
    Lampoon is insolvent and the royalties are where? Not being accounted for in the whooping $2m gross revenue last year. NO value there or the only operating place--united trailer

    Trustee is almost as bad as Timmy
  • gosh
    That was predictable, I am surprised they left 100k on the table for the poor Amish folks.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

    2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

    3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

    4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

    5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

    ADVERTISEMENT