Judge delays fines for boycotting Indiana Democrats

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana House Democrats got a boost Thursday when a judge temporarily blocked the collection of $1,000-a-day fines imposed on them for their legislative boycott over the contentious right-to-work bill, and their leader said they might return to the House chamber Friday to vote.

The temporary injunction from Marion County Judge David Dreyer covers three Democratic representatives who have challenged the authority of the House leadership to deduct the fines from their state paychecks.

The judge's order came hours after most of the 40 House Democrats skipped an attempt by majority Republicans to hold a House session, leaving it for a third day with too few members to begin the scheduled debate on proposed amendments to the bill.

House Democratic leader Patrick Bauer said the party's lawyers were working to find a way to hold a voter referendum despite questions over whether it is allowed under the state Constitution.

"We are doing this so the people have a voice and they have a constitutionally approved opportunity to have a referendum," Bauer said.

Bauer said the proposal could be prepared as soon as Friday, possibly clearing the way for the 35 absent Democrats to return to the House floor and allowing action on the right-to-work bill and other legislation.

The Democrats' court challenge centers on the legality of the fines being deducted from their pay, not whether those fines could be imposed. Republican leaders maintain how they've handled the fines is legal and that the courts don't have the authority to intervene in the Legislature's inner workings.

"We're a separate branch of government, some people haven't figured that out," Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller, whose office is representing House Republicans and the state, echoed Bosma.

"The order is unfortunate and is a textbook example of why we have separate branches of government and why courts should not allow the judicial system to be used as a legislative tactic during the heat of the session," Zoeller said in a statement Thursday night.

Bosma tried to gavel the House into order twice on Thursday and said he hadn't had any communication with Democratic leaders about their return.

The right-to-work bill will be debated Friday regardless, since state Senate leaders decided to move up their scheduled plans for debating and voting on proposed amendments to the measure.

The injunction covers Democrats Shelli VanDenburgh of Crown Point and Vanessa Summers of Indianapolis, who filed a lawsuit after majority Republicans voted Wednesday to start imposing the fines. It also covers Bill Crawford of Indianapolis, who sued over the collection of smaller fines from last year's boycott.

Bauer said he expects other boycotting Democrats to join the suit, possibly including himself.

Republican Senate President Pro Tem David Long said House Democrats are giving flimsy excuses for their boycott and that he agreed with an analysis by legislative lawyers that the state constitution doesn't allow statewide voter referendums except on constitutional amendments.

"A simple legal analysis by a law student could have figured that out in no time," Long said. "Read your constitution, it's in black and white."

House Democratic leaders maintain that the constitutional question is being used as a defense by wavering Republicans for voting against the referendum proposal.

"We're eliminating the excuse," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City.

Long said the Senate — where Republicans hold a commanding 37-13 majority — would start debating its version of the right-to-work bill on Friday, after saying earlier Thursday that the Senate wouldn't act until next week. He said that Republican senators decided to take up the bill sooner since House Democrats hadn't committed to returning.

The outnumbered Senate Democrats can't block action with a similar boycott, but also plan to seek the voter referendum that House Democrats have advocated. Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Bloomington, said she expected most Democrats would oppose a proposal by a Republican senator to exempt construction trades unions from the bill.

"Divide and conquer is very old wartime concept and we're not in favor of dividing the opponents and conquering them in that way," Simpson said.


  • Interesting Commentary
    My...the debate is at such a high level today...such profound observations. I note the bile in the commentary seems to be directly proportional to one's inability to spell correctly.
  • Union Pockets
    Seems the judge may also be on Union payouts.....
  • Judge's name
    The judge is Marion County Judge David Dreyer. It has been added to the story.
  • Dumbocrats
    This idiot judge must be a lefty loon as well. Fire him and impeach all of the idiots that are getting paid to act like babies. We the people elected them to represent us. The dumbocrats are not representing us...they are striking like the union does when it is not happy.
  • Losers
    Pat Bauer is not a "leader", he is a loser. Wake up and smell the coffee Pat, and get back to the job to which you were elected.
  • Nameless Judge?
    Why does the author not name the judge who sent down this ruling? Who is the author trying to protect?
    • Typical Leftist tactics
      Bovine Scatology! It does not suprise me that a group of leftist (socialist pigs) like the Democrat party and Unions would stoop to constitutional illegalities to get "their way". This is how all earthly lefttist/marxist/commie B@%*@&ds get things done. When that does not work... then they will return to violence. It will happen, trust me!

      Lets (politcally speaking)put the crosshairs(yea I said it) on those loosers and ruin there political ambitions forever. That fat cat with the phoney hair hat will have a smaller minority to cuddle with next year. Just wait and see.
    • Freedom to work
      you can not charge me to work! it is against the law for anyone to make me pay to keep my job. i think everyone who has ever been kept from a job because you didnt think its fair to have to pay someone to so that you can work or keep your job should march down to the Statehouse and let mitch know that we would like to have jobs too. shame on pat for screwing over the Demos in Indiana. Pat you dont speak for us not all of us. and walking out... just proves why you should not be leading Indiana Democrats. shame on you!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.