IBJNews

Judge tosses Noble Roman's franchisee claims

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Noble Roman's Inc. has won a pivotal courtroom victory in a battle with 14 former franchisees of its dual-branded Noble Roman’s Pizza and Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs restaurants.

The Indianapolis-based chain is pursuing a judgment of more than $3.6 million against the former franchisees after a Hamilton County judge in December tossed civil claims that the chain committed fraud.

The franchisees filed a lawsuit in June 2008, saying Noble Roman’s misled them about the costs and profit potential of the restaurants. The former franchise locations, in several states including Kentucky, Missouri and California, have since closed.

The chain argued the franchisees were entirely at fault for their own failures, thanks to “mismanagement and incompetence.” Yet the chain has acknowledged that its effort to quickly open hundreds of stand-alone, dual-branded Noble Roman’s and Tuscano’s locations did not work out as hoped.

"This has been a long and expensive lawsuit but we are pleased the court has recognized that the allegations of fraud against the company and its officers were without merit," company president A. Scott Mobley wrote in an e-mail.

The franchises were seeking more than $8 million in damages, a sum that could have left Noble Roman's insolvent. The chain, which operates in 45 states, has a market value of just $20 million. Noble Roman's shares closed at $1.05 apiece on Friday.

Hamilton County Superior Court Judge Steven R. Nation wrote that the franchisees had "no reasonable right" to rely on the chain's verbal sales pitch.

"There was an acknowledgment in the franchise agreement that plaintiff understood and acknowledged the obligation to conduct an independent investigation and the business involved a substantial risk," Nation wrote in the ruling on Dec. 23, 2010.

Noble Roman’s has reinvented itself several times over the years since launching in the 1970s as a chain of dine-in restaurants. In 1997, after intense competition and rising costs made stand-alone pizza joints difficult to operate profitably, Noble Roman’s turned to franchising and opened about 800 nontraditional outlets in locations such as convenience stores, bowling alleys and hospitals.

The chain sold about 90 dual-format franchises between 2006 and 2008 and 55 of them opened, but at least half have since closed.

“The franchisees were misled into buying a concept that was not sufficiently tested,” franchisee attorney P. Adam Davis of locally based Davis & Sarbinoff LLP told IBJ in August 2009. “They were in fact the guinea pigs. And that’s not what you buy a franchise for. The point is that you’re getting a tested and proven concept."

Davis, who took over the case after Nation revoked the temporary admission of attorney David M. Duree of Illinois, was not available to discuss the judge's ruling.

Noble Roman's latest reinvention involves a new offering of take-and-bake pizzas, pasta sauces, deep-dish lasagna and other retail products in grocery stores.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT