IBJNews

Judges to hear challenge to state’s alcohol permit process

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A complaint arguing that Indiana’s system of issuing alcohol permits violates state law is set to be heard by a panel of appellate court judges on Monday.

The Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, which represents the state’s package liquor stores, is seeking to stop the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission from issuing new permits until the judges can clarify state quota laws.

The dispute arose from a legislative compromise in 2008 that rewrote beer permit rules and lowered the number of available alcohol permits based on population. The association agreed to the deal, provided that drugstores be classified as grocery stores when applying for an alcohol permit—in theory limiting competition.

But the commission has interpreted the law so that groceries and drugstores have separate quotas and, as a result, the association says permit numbers in some cities exceed what should be allowed.

“If [it’s] not counting them against the quota, there are more of them out there, which increases competition,” said John Livengood, president and CEO of the beverage retailers association. “We’re getting to the point where we’re awash in alcohol permits.”

Dozens of alcohol permits filed by the Walgreens drugstore chain further pushed the beverage retailers association to challenge the permitting process. Walgreens received approval to sell alcohol at 14 of its stores in Indianapolis. Altogether, it had sought to sell alcohol in 183 stores throughout the state.

In a court filing, the beverage retailers association cites an example in which a town might have 12 beer dealer permits available. But under the method in which the commission interprets the law, a total of 24 beer permits could be issued.

“There is only one type of beer dealer’s permit available to grocery stores and drugstores under the relevant statutory provisions or under any rule,” the association argued in the filing.

The case is being considered on appeal after a Marion Superior Court judge last year denied a motion by the beverage retailers association for a temporary restraining order seeking to halt permits.

“We thought the trial court got it right,” said Mark Massa, chairman of the Alcohol and Tobacco Commission. “It’s been the custom and practice for nearly 40 years to count permits in this manner.

A three-judge state appellate court panel will hear oral arguments at 11 a.m. Monday in Room 413 of the Statehouse.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Competition
    Why does the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers think they are going to get public sympathy by saying more permits creates more competition? Maybe competition is bad for them but it's good for us consumers! I can't stand these people. They're not for preventing drunk driving or any other facade they put up, they're out for themselves.
  • Show ID
    Aren't we tired of the "lets get the drivers license out" every single time we buy a case of beer. Who was the rocket scientist that came up with this law?
  • Typical
    The Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers has no clue what the real value of a Liquor stores is. It is not in the sale of commodity alcohol. It's in their vastly superior selection and a trained and knowledgeable staff.
  • really?
    So competition is a bad thing now? Sounds like someone is trying really hard to protect their own interests.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT