IBJNews

Judges to hear challenge to state’s alcohol permit process

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A complaint arguing that Indiana’s system of issuing alcohol permits violates state law is set to be heard by a panel of appellate court judges on Monday.

The Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, which represents the state’s package liquor stores, is seeking to stop the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission from issuing new permits until the judges can clarify state quota laws.

The dispute arose from a legislative compromise in 2008 that rewrote beer permit rules and lowered the number of available alcohol permits based on population. The association agreed to the deal, provided that drugstores be classified as grocery stores when applying for an alcohol permit—in theory limiting competition.

But the commission has interpreted the law so that groceries and drugstores have separate quotas and, as a result, the association says permit numbers in some cities exceed what should be allowed.

“If [it’s] not counting them against the quota, there are more of them out there, which increases competition,” said John Livengood, president and CEO of the beverage retailers association. “We’re getting to the point where we’re awash in alcohol permits.”

Dozens of alcohol permits filed by the Walgreens drugstore chain further pushed the beverage retailers association to challenge the permitting process. Walgreens received approval to sell alcohol at 14 of its stores in Indianapolis. Altogether, it had sought to sell alcohol in 183 stores throughout the state.

In a court filing, the beverage retailers association cites an example in which a town might have 12 beer dealer permits available. But under the method in which the commission interprets the law, a total of 24 beer permits could be issued.

“There is only one type of beer dealer’s permit available to grocery stores and drugstores under the relevant statutory provisions or under any rule,” the association argued in the filing.

The case is being considered on appeal after a Marion Superior Court judge last year denied a motion by the beverage retailers association for a temporary restraining order seeking to halt permits.

“We thought the trial court got it right,” said Mark Massa, chairman of the Alcohol and Tobacco Commission. “It’s been the custom and practice for nearly 40 years to count permits in this manner.

A three-judge state appellate court panel will hear oral arguments at 11 a.m. Monday in Room 413 of the Statehouse.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Competition
    Why does the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers think they are going to get public sympathy by saying more permits creates more competition? Maybe competition is bad for them but it's good for us consumers! I can't stand these people. They're not for preventing drunk driving or any other facade they put up, they're out for themselves.
  • Show ID
    Aren't we tired of the "lets get the drivers license out" every single time we buy a case of beer. Who was the rocket scientist that came up with this law?
  • Typical
    The Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers has no clue what the real value of a Liquor stores is. It is not in the sale of commodity alcohol. It's in their vastly superior selection and a trained and knowledgeable staff.
  • really?
    So competition is a bad thing now? Sounds like someone is trying really hard to protect their own interests.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

    2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

    3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

    4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

    5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

    ADVERTISEMENT