IBJNews

Lawmakers propose DCS hotline changes, new panels

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana lawmakers reviewing the embattled Department of Child Services voted Tuesday to localize more decisions on when to investigate cases of child abuse and neglect and set up a permanent oversight committee at the Statehouse.

Members of a study committee reviewing DCS operations asked the state to draft emergency regulations that would give county field workers a voice in the handling of abuse and neglect calls to a central hotline. The panel also proposed creating a permanent legislative committee to oversee the agency and recommended expanding and adding child fatality review teams.

Tuesday's action came after months of emotional hearings on troubles at the agency following news media investigations into dozens of child deaths across the state. Lawmakers and children's advocates blamed the state's centralized abuse reporting hotline in large part for "screening out" calls that should have been investigated.

DCS officials said Tuesday's decision would maintain a centralized reporting system they have called a national model, while decentralizing decisions on which calls are investigated.

"The hotline would send all calls to the local office, then the local office would make the decision under this plan" David Judkins, DCS deputy director of field operations, told the panel.

The state estimates the program would cost $9 million, much of it for hiring new caseworkers to work in the county field offices. DCS has struggled to retain caseworkers, largely based on the low salary offered by the state.

The new plan could face a potential road bump with Gov.-elect Mike Pence, who has promised to place a moratorium on new regulations upon taking office. His campaign has pointed out, however, that the proposed moratorium includes an exemption for "rules necessary to address emergency health or safety concerns."

The panel also signed off on submitting the new plan as legislation next year, should it need to be written into the state's books, rather than leaving it as a recommended administrative move by DCS.

The group also proposed creating an 11-member Committee on Child Services Oversight consisting of lawmakers, state agency representatives and appointees from the public defenders council and the prosecuting attorneys council. The panel would study monthly reports from DCS, review DCS contractors and ponder a range of other issues.

Oversight and training of local child fatality review teams would also be shifted from DCS to the state health department. Counties would be required to create review teams or join together to staff regional teams that would investigate child deaths that are "sudden," ''unexpected" or "unexplained."

Committee co-chair Sen. Travis Holdman, a Merkle Republican, thanked panel members for their extensive work on the issue as they wrapped up their final meeting Tuesday.

"I'm into my sixth year (as a senator) and I don't think I've ever been on a more intense study committee than this one," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT