IBJNews

Legislation would allow ads on public school buses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Big yellow school buses could become rolling billboards in a bill approved by the Indiana Senate.

The bill would allow advertising on school buses in two Indianapolis neighborhoods and a school district just north of the city to help combat burdensome transportation costs.

The ads would give cash-strapped school districts a way to raise revenue without increasing taxes.

The bill passed the Senate 49-0 as part of an amendment to another bill, the Indianapolis Star reported. It now goes to the House.

One of the districts affected would be Indianapolis' Franklin Township schools, a district that drew the ire of parents when it started charging for bus rides. The plan was later dropped.

The pilot plan would also allow school bus ads in Beech Grove and Zionsville.

The legislation prohibits political advertising, inappropriate images or the marketing of harmful or offensive products such as tobacco or alcohol.

Colorado became the first school to allow school bus advertising in 1993, the Kokomo Tribune reported. Since then, 10 other states have followed.





 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Brilliant!
    Great idea! There are advertisements all over sporting event programs, etc.. Kids sell brand name products for school. Why not? Guess what, I use the businesses who advertise in our church program, school directory and athletic field/gym signage. What you should worry about is what's in the textbooks that you spend $$$ to purchase.
  • I am supportive of this.
    Taxes on my home in Franklin Township dropped from $3900 a year to $1371 per year after the tax caps. I personally am very supportive of anything that keeps it low, even something as gaudy and ridiculous as vinyl wraps on school busses. Whatever man. These houses are a bargain now. But, if I had kids, I'd consider moving to another area of town where the school system was on a more solid footing...
  • Bad Idea! Goofball Legislature Acts Again
    I agree wholeheartedly with Ugh! Why would thinking adults allow this to happen? Is there no Senator in the Indiana legislature that is able to think through the implications of these types of policies? I bet their was a business lobbyist behind this proposal.
  • Ugh
    Bad idea. Keep education and commercialism separate. We want thinking and creative young adults to come out of our public schools, not "consumers". At most, use ad space for intelligent PSA-type messages and let companies sponsor them with their name/logo in a corner.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT