IBJNews

Legislative panel passes mass-transit funding plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legislative panel on Thursday endorsed a central Indiana mass-transit funding plan that could mean a tax increase for residents and businesses, and require approval from local officials and voters.

The Central Indiana Transit Study Committee voted 12-1 for a proposal that its chairwoman – Sen. Pat Miller, R-Indianapolis – called a “concept” rather than legislation. It would allow counties to impose a tax on corporations and a local income tax on residents, but would also require that fares paid by bus riders fund at least a quarter of the system’s operating costs.

The proposal does not address what kind of mass-transit system could be developed.

“We’re trying to leave the decisions to local government,” Miller said. “The vast majority of the people on the committee felt that we would not dictate to local units of government, that we would give them the wherewithal to make their decisions and leave it to local governments to design their plans.”

Miller said the proposal will be fleshed out before the 2014 session, when she and Sen. Brent Waltz, R-Greenwood, will introduce it as a bill.

Ron Gifford, executive director of Indy Connect Now, a coalition pushing for expanded mass transit in central Indiana, called the proposal a “very constructive framework” for starting the legislative process.

He said it is somewhat similar to a proposal approved earlier this year by the Indiana House. The Senate amended that bill to order a study of the issue in advance of the 2014 session.

“There are a few new ideas we have to look at, but overall it continues to move the conversation forward in a very positive way,” Gifford said. “This is a good proposal to get us started.”

Originally, advocates proposed a $1.3 billion mass-transit expansion plan that would have included more buses, more routes and a light-rail line between downtown Indianapolis and Hamilton County. The latter has been particularly controversial and discussion has since moved away from the rail proposal, focusing instead on express buses.

As approved on Thursday, the plan would give local officials in five counties – Marion, Hamilton, Johnson, Madison and Delaware – the authority to develop plans and ask voters for permission to raise taxes through referendums.

Those options include an increase in the County Economic Development Income Tax and a business tax that would be imposed as a corporate income tax or a county employment tax, which is essentially a fee charged based on the number of a company’s employees. The business taxes would impact only those firms organized as so-called C corporations, not on partnerships or sole proprietorships.

Those corporate taxes could make up no more than 10 percent of the total operating costs of the system. And fares or other ridership fees would have to make up at least 25 percent of the spending.

Sen. Luke Kenley, a Noblesville Republican who heads the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the mix of taxes is meant to capture income from those who had been advocating the proposal. That includes a number of central Indiana business officials who testified that their employees need better ways to get to work and that an expanded mass-transit system would bolster economic development.

“We thought there ought to be some shared ownership in terms of paying for the system,” Kenley said. “It’s always fun to talk about something new; it’s a lot harder to come up with how to pay for it.”

The lone vote against the plan came from Rep. Mike Speedy, R-Indianapolis, who said he was concerned about the message that a tax increase on businesses would send.

“We are making recommendations to ultimately take additional dollars from the private sector,” Speedy said. The result might “not be best serving the people we’re intending to serve.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lawrence
    Hope the city of Lawrence comes on board. They have been anti-transit for years yet they have a willing (underserved?) population. The Finance Center and Social Security customer center are on Post Road, as is Ivy Tech and several other incubator firms. Industry and retail on Pendleton Pike would draw more if served more.
  • See Ya
    Bye Roger. Hope Paducah is everything you wished for.
  • Mass Transit Has A Role
    Good comments! I live near the intersection of 96th St and I-69. I scratch my head when I see the commuting mess each morning and evening in the area I live. If I were a young person looking to the future, I would scratch my head and wonder how the city can justify not developing and funding a better mass transit system. The need and potential benefits become more clear if you have visited and commuted in cities with great mass transit systems such as Chicago, New York, Washington DC, San Francisco, etc.
  • Excellent Points
    Very well said!
  • Where are you going to go?
    Roger, I understand your concerns as a 40+ year business person, myself, I don't know where that perfect place might be to locate a business. I think we are seeing some major shifts in demographics. The future will bring more public transit as I believe in the next 2 decades you will be billed directly for the distance you drive, the roads you use and time of day you use them. This will lead to alternatives being sought out and should make public transit more palatable economically. My only point is I am sick of big businesses advocating change that benefits them and then they try to pass off the cost of their benefits at the expense of taxpayers.
    • Really?
      Rick, as a business owner, I will simply move my business out of Indianapolis and even out of the metro area as countless others have done for the last 30 years. You people have a death wish. Look around at your decaying, crumbling city. You can blame it on the usual suspects all you want. This businessman is sick and tired of Hoosier myopia. It's a great big world and there are better places to do business. You want to keep forcing more big city nonsense down the throats of people who live in the only metro area in the world where you can close all the freeways through downtown and not even notice the additional traffic? You go right ahead, and when everybody is gone, be sure to turn out the lights before leaving yourself.
      • Share the wealth share the cost!
        I like Senator Kenley's reasoning on why businesses should not be exempt from paying a fee for getting their employees to work. We don't do the best job of recognizing the difference between advocating a position and having some skin in the game. No personal commitment + Advocating = hot air A waste of resources and creates inefficient allocations of resources.

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

        2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

        3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

        4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

        5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

        ADVERTISEMENT