IBJNews

Marsh hit with second federal labor charge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The National Labor Relations Board again has charged Marsh Supermarkets Inc. with violating federal law by threatening and intimidating workers attempting to unionize the grocery chain.

NLRB issued a complaint earlier this week accusing Marsh of violating employee rights at its Beech Grove store in advance of a scheduled vote to unionize in September. The latest charges follow a similar complaint filed by NLRB in December involving Marsh’s Georgetown Road store.

“The new charges indicate that the threats and intimidating tactics the NLRB found evidence of at the Georgetown Road store were not an isolated incident, but instead part of a broader pattern of coercive management tactics,” the United Food and Commercial Workers Union said in a Friday press release.

NLRB accuses Marsh management of placing workers at the Beech Grove store under surveillance, threatening employees with retaliation for supporting unionization, and even firing one for backing the attempt to organize.

Marsh executive Dave Redden "vehemently" denied the charges, saying "we remain confident that in the end these allegations will be found to be without merit.”

NLRB has set a Feb. 16 hearing to present details of the unfair labor practices it has levied against Marsh.

As IBJ reported last fall, the union drive picked up steam as Marsh's parent company tried to sell the chain then pulled it off the market after failing to find a buyer.  

Florida-based private equity firm Sun Capital Partners, which bought Marsh for $88 million in cash and the assumption of $237 million in debt, found no takers after it began marketing Marsh for $130 million to $150 million in late 2009.

The labor relations board certified a 44-employee bargaining unit at the Beech Grove Marsh store, and a vote to authorize the union was scheduled for September.

But Local 700 canceled the election after Marsh reportedly fired an employee in retaliation for his organizing activities, assigned corporate staff to the store on Albany Street in Beech Grove to intimidate employees, and trained security cameras on one employee.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • odikhmantievich.blogspot.com
    Card-check must be agreed to by the employer. Any employer in the United States can force a secret-ballot election.

    Unions are non-profit.

    Some locals have more of a problem with crime and corruption than others. But no union is as comprehensively involved in intricate criminal plots as any given financial firm.
  • Intimidation?
    Wow! Talk about intimidation - have you ever been approaced by a union organizer? They are RELENTLESS - they call you at home, visit your home, meet you in the parking lot, folow you around - all tring to get you to sign their "card". Telling you that if you sign the "card" you are only saying you want to be able to Vote for a union. They do not tell you that if enough people (a simple majority) signs the "card" then there is no vote and you are automatically in the union. Get over it union organizers - you are a thing of the past! you are a "for profit" group that NEEDS memberships to pay YOUR salaries and travel. Read about their corruption and how they are stil tied with the Mob. www.unionfacts.com or www.unionfreeamerica.com

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT