IBJNews

Much of trustee’s suit against Fair Finance lenders dismissed

Scott Olson
November 12, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fair Finance Co.'s investors have been dealt a blow by a federal judge who dismissed a bankruptcy trustee's lawsuit against one of the company’s deep-pocketed lenders.

Trustee Brian Bash in February sued Fair’s lenders—Rhode Island-based Textron Financial Corp. and New York-based Fortress Credit Corp.—seeking up to $1.2 billion in actual and treble damages.

The suit charged the companies turned a blind eye to Fair CEO Tim Durham’s fraudulent activities because they were making millions of dollars on their lending relationship and held first liens on the only Fair assets with real value.

It accused the two companies, which have billions in assets, of aiding and abetting theft, fraud and insiders’ breaches of fiduciary duty.

But Judge Patricia A. Gaughan of the Northern District of Ohio’s Eastern Division said in her ruling Friday that Fair Finance is at least “equally” responsible for the harm to investors, and she dismissed the claims against Textron.

“Textron need only show that [Fair Finance] is at least as culpable as Textron,” the judge wrote. “Textron need not establish that it is less culpable.”

Regarding Fortress, the judge dismissed some counts against it and ruled that the trustee cannot collect treble damages because the  company did not commit a criminal act of damage to property, or theft.

It's not clear whether Bash intends to appeal the ruling. He and his attorneys were not immediately available for comment.

Without a big recovery from Textron or Fortress, Fair investors—who purchased unsecured notes with interest rates as high as 9 percent—may face an uphill battle recovering a signficant chunk of the more than $200 million they're owed.

The judge did decide that the trustee’s claims that Fortress intentionally committed fraud can go forward.

“Loan funds borrowed from Fortress were ‘directly routed to a debtor-owned account for use by Durham in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme,’” the judge wrote.

The judge said Fair created a special-purpose entity to receive Fortress funds only after Fortress declined to consider making Fair a direct loan. "Moreover," the judge wrote, "the Fair Finance SPE was controlled by Durham and [James] Cochran, who in turn have been convicted of a massive fraudulent scheme.”

A grand jury in March 2011 indicted Durham, Cochran and Fair Chief Financial Officer Rick Snow on charges of wire fraud, securities fraud and conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud. A jury convicted Durham on all charges and Cochran and Snow on some charges in June. The three are scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 30.

The lawsuit against Textron and Fortress was Bash’s most aggressive push yet to recover money for the Ohio residents who bought Fair's unsecured notes. Payments ceased to all 5,000 noteholders when the company collapsed in November 2009.

Bash has filed dozens of suits since early 2010. But most seek to recover relatively small sums that were transferred out of Fair at a time the trustee alleges it was insolvent. Many of the defendants are Durham friends or business associates who appear to have few assets.

Durham and Cochran bought Akron, Ohio-based Fair in a 2002 leveraged buyout. Authorities charged that almost immediately, Durham drained tens of millions from the company by making loans to himself and failing businesses he owned. They say millions also went toward Durham’s mansions, a yacht, part ownership of an airplane and extravagant gambling trips.

The trustee’s suit charges that by December 2003, Fair already was operating as a Ponzi scheme reliant on the sale of additional unsecured notes to Ohio residents to stay afloat.

Textron provided a $22 million line of credit that financed the purchase of Fair from then-owner Donald Fair. Since its founding in 1934, the business had focused on buying finance contracts from fitness clubs, time-share condominium developers and other firms that offered their customers extended-payment plans.

To catch up on IBJ's coverage of Fair Finance and Durham, click here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT