New CEO ready to tackle symphony's challenges

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gary Ginstling acknowledges the heap of work that awaits him when he begins as CEO of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra on March 18.

The group has operated at a deficit for years. Its endowment has shrunk. Its musicians had to take steep pay cuts to end a lockout last year, and the management team has multiple vacancies.

ISO CEO Gary Gistling mug shotGinstling

He sees it all as an opportunity to resurrect a group the community showed its support for after former CEO Simon Crookall abruptly departed in February 2012.

“I think it’s important for the organization to really create a vision in how … it fits into the community,” Ginstling said Wednesday, shortly after the ISO announced his hiring.

Ginstling, 46, now is general manager for the Cleveland Orchestra. Before arriving there in 2008, he was the executive director of communications and external affairs for the San Francisco Symphony, and before that was executive director of the Berkeley Symphony Orchestra.

ISO also needs to think about broadening its programming beyond symphonic music, he said, boasting of successes the Cleveland Orchestra had performing ballets, operas, pop music and other genres that tapped new audience members.

While the Cleveland Orchestra’s main season attendance remained flat, it reported a one-third increase in patronage at its summer shows.

A clarinetist and New Jersey native, Ginstling earned an MBA at the Anderson School of Business at UCLA. He also has a master's of music degree from the Juilliard School and a bachelor of arts, with magna cum laude honors, from Yale University.

“As a senior manager in two major American orchestras, Gary is a passionate champion of orchestral music and has all the necessary artistic and business skills to lead our Indianapolis Symphony,” ISO Board Chairwoman Martha Lamkin said in a prepared statement. “Even more importantly, he is the ideal leader to bring us to the next level in patron engagement, artistic innovation, and annual support and donor cultivation through a broader approach to our musical footprint, at home and all across the state.”

Ginstling will take charge of an organization that has revamped its business model after years of financial difficulties.

The organization finished its 2011-2012 fiscal year with a $900,000 deficit, which was down from the previous year only after a steep $11.4 million draw from its endowment.

ISO management, citing concerns about its reliance on the investment fund after it took hard hits in 2008 and 2009, scaled back the number of shows the full-time musicians will play over the next five years as a way to cut costs.

Musicians were locked out in September and October after contract negotiations stalled. The 70 performers went back to work after agreeing to cut entry-level pay from $78,000 to $53,000, then gradually restoring it to $70,000 by 2017.

One of the most prominent provisions of the contract talks was the emergence of plans to step up donations as a way to reduce drawing down the endowment.

The ISO currently raises about $6.5 million a year, but it wants to pull in $12.6 million by the end of 2017.

To ignite the effort, an October bridge contract between management and the union mandated that the organization raise $5 million from new donors by Feb. 3 or risk resuming contract talks.

The group blew past its goal, collecting $5.4 million from new donors and another $3.1 million from existing donors. Lilly Endowment will contribute another $2 million because the ISO hit its $5 million goal.

That’s momentum Ginstling wants to tap.

“Fundraising is obviously a big part of it,” he said. “And it all really comes together. The strategy is to do more for more people. [That] makes the case of why it is such an important part of the community.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.