IBJNews

NFL lockout could prove costly to Indy economy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sarah Hershberger considers herself a casual football fan with a growing interest — in one particular game.

Like everyone else in Indianapolis, she's hoping that NFL team owners and the players' union are able to strike a labor deal that allows the season to go on and next year's Super Bowl to kick off as scheduled on Feb. 5.

This isn't about hoping the Colts have a great 2011 and wind up as the first team to play in America's most popular sporting event at their home stadium. No, Hershberger just wants to know how to plan for Super Bowl week at the Staybridge Suites hotel, where she is the assistant manager.

"I know they're working on negotiations or something, and I know that there could be some danger of the game not being played," Hershberger said, shaking her head.

It's too much to contemplate, so Hershberger is banking on the game being played.

Still, while danger may be small, it is real. Players have said they expect the league to lock them out if agreement is not reached on a collective bargaining agreement by the time the current one runs out at the end of the day on March 3.

The worst-case scenario — no season — would mean the city of Indianapolis sustaining the most expensive hit in league history. Not even Peyton Manning could afford this one.

"The effects could be consequential," said Michael Hicks, director of Ball State's Center for Business and Economic Research. "We'll probably see a loss of $200 million if there is a lockout."

Hicks knows.

Three years ago, he published a study that examined the economic impact of the Super Bowl on host cities from 1969 to 2005. Hicks found the economic boost ranged from $360 million to $450 million. Chris Gahl, spokesman for the Indiana Visitors and Convention Association, said league officials believe Indy will get an infusion of at least $150 million next year.

Yet after spending four years fine-tuning every detail, from locating an army of knitters to make Super Bowl scarves to checking on the downtown construction project organizers have billed as Olympics Village meets the Super Bowl, the one question that won't go away in Indy is this: Could it all be for naught?

"It's so unlikely that there won't be a Super Bowl that it's just something I'm not even thinking about," said Dianna Boyce, spokeswoman for the 2012 host committee who spent this week watching money and fans flow through Dallas, braving snow in Texas to see the big bowl.

Perhaps it's wishful thinking.

NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith has repeatedly said he expects a lockout, perhaps by March 4, even as commissioner Roger Goodell insists a deal will be in place long before the Super Bowl is jeopardized.

"The message to our friends in Indianapolis is to continue their plans," Goodell said at a news conference on Friday. "We believe we're going to be playing there."

Nonetheless, there is precedent from other sports. Baseball fans remember the cancellation of the 1994 World Series and hockey fans recall the season without a Stanley Cup (2004-05). A lost season in football could prove more costly.

The union contends $160 million in local spending and 3,000 jobs would be lost in each NFL city if the season is not played. Player salaries account for 30 percent to 50 percent of that $160 million.

City officials did not have an estimate for how much money Colts' home games provide on a given weekend.

While league spokesman Greg Aiello challenges the union numbers, losing the Super Bowl would be quite costly for Indy's retailers, restaurateurs and hoteliers.

The city already has blocked out more than 18,000 rooms at 141 hotels for two weekends next February. The list includes Hershberger's entire hotel, which is less than one block from Lucas Oil Stadium, and new ones such as the J.W. Marriott. The 1,005-room Marriott opened Friday.

Without the game, or any other big events in town during those two February weekends, filling those beds will be tough.

"It's important both sides come to an agreement," said John Livengood, president of the Indiana Hotel and Lodging Association and Indiana Restaurant Association. "Probably the hotels to some degree would be hit a little harder because they rely more on people coming in from out of town."

The other potential problem could emerge in the city's restaurants.

One early concern, Livengood said, was finding enough downtown space to feed the projected 150,000 out-of-town visitors that are expected to fill hotel rooms as far away as Terre Haute and Richmond, cities near the Illinois and Ohio state lines. Because of corporate events and private parties during Super Bowl week, Livengood says some restaurants have "ramped up" efforts to fill the demand.

Losing the game could leave those seats empty, too.

"Every time we have a meeting someone asks a question (about the lockout), though the phones aren't ringing off the hook," Livengood said. "There's nothing you can do about it, you just have to hope it gets worked out."

Either way, organizers do not expect it to be a total washout.

Last month, host committee chairman Mark Miles acknowledged the league has assured city officials Indy would get a future Super Bowl if next year's is canceled. The presumption is it would come back in 2015. New Orleans is scheduled to host the Super Bowl in 2013, with East Rutherford, N.J., getting the game in 2014.

But three years is a long time to wait.

"Over a three or four-year period it may sort of round out," Hicks said. "But this is when we really would like it."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • when will the hotels be unblocked Feb 10-12,2012?
    when are they going to release the hotel rooms the weekend after the NFL superbowl football game in indianapolis . Feb 10-12th is the weekend after the game and the hotels all around indy are still blocked. WHY.!!! rediculous. People and corporations need to let us have our hotels back .
  • Because...
    HarveyF:

    1. Why not? If it's going to be held somewhere, scabs or no scabs, it's better to host than not at all IMO.

    2. As with most challenges, the first 'win' is the hardest. If the SB goes off well on this bid, then it makes for an easier lobby to get the SB again at a later date.

    Oppty cost decreases as subsequent bids are sought/won).
  • Not telling the whole story...
    The story failed to discuss the effect of Reebok (in the last year of their NFL contract) or the effect on local retailers Finish Line, Lids and MainGate.
  • What did you think?
    What do you think would have happened if The Marriot hadn't opened on time one year before our supposed superbowl? What cash incentives went by in the books (and under the table)? How many violations and codes do you think have been forfieted in order to open on time?
  • Indy Is a Sports Town
    Thank goodness the Indianapolis Motor Speedway is in the centennial era, delivering multiple Super Bowl economic impacts every year.

    That said, here's hoping the two sides in the NFL dispute don't continue going down the stupid path. A Super Bowl in Indy would be great.
  • 2008
    Here's an article from 2008 where the lockout and the Indy Super Bowl was discussed. This possibility was known from the get-go.

    http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2008/05/Issue-169/Leagues-Governing-Bodies/Upshaw-Says-He-Does-Not-Believe-That-Teams-Are-Losing-Money.aspx
  • maybe blessing instead
    They bid for this year's and got beat out by Dallas. Who was predicting a cancellation 4 - 5 years ago. However now look at the weather. Can you imagine how bad it would have been with our weather this year and the issues Dallas has had all week. Maybe next year it will be 40 and sunny.
  • The Why?
    Then why did Indianapolis go for this Superbowl if they knew a lockout or a Scab Super Bowl was a possibility? Did Indy get bamboozled by the NFL owners? Time will tell

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT