IBJNews

Noble Roman's awarded $1.5M in battle with franchisees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Noble Roman’s Inc. is still waiting to collect about $1.5 million more than a year after scoring an apparent victory in a lengthy court battle with some of its former franchisees.

The Indianapolis-based chain had pursued a judgment of more than $3.6 million against former franchisees after a Hamilton County judge in December 2011 tossed civil claims that the chain committed fraud.

The dispute started in June 2008, when the franchisees filed suit claiming Noble Roman’s misled them about the costs and profit potential of the restaurants. The former franchises, in several states including Kentucky, Missouri and California, have since closed.

After a judge dismissed the claims, Noble Roman’s countersued against 14 franchisees, arguing that the restaurants failed to stay open for 10 years, a requirement of the franchise agreement. A dozen of those franchisees were eventually dropped from the countersuit.

A jury awarded Noble Roman’s $86,290 and $78,302, plus court costs and interest, in late 2012 against the two remaining franchisees. But Hamilton Superior Court Judge Steven Nation didn’t sign off on the verdict until last month, when he ordered the franchisees to pay additional fees of $1.1 million to the chain’s attorneys.

“The agreements required [the franchisees] to keep [their restaurants] open for a 10-year term,” said Jeffrey Gaither, an attorney for Noble Roman’s. “When they closed after a year or two years or whatever, Noble Roman’s was entitled to damages and the royalties they would have received.”

Attorneys for the franchisees argued, however, that Noble Roman’s franchise agreements do not provide for future royalties.

They asked the judge in a March 19 motion to reconsider both the jury award and the attorneys’ fees.

“We’re appealing everything,” said P. Adam Davis, a lawyer for the two former franchisees. “[The motion] gives him an opportunity to reconsider what he awarded and what he ruled on before we go to appeal.”

A hearing on the motion is set for June 17.

With the threat of an appeal looming, lawyers for Noble Roman’s have asked the court to require the former franchisees to post what’s known as an appeals bond in the amount of $1.5 million each.

“You have the right to appeal. But because the judge entered a final judgment, we could start the collection now,” Gaither said. “If you post the bond with the trial court, it says we’re not going to let Noble Roman’s seize your bank accounts. But if we win, the assets will be right there immediately for us.”

The franchises had sought more than $8 million in damages against Noble Roman, a sum that could have left Noble Roman’s insolvent had the judge not dismissed their claims.

In recent years, Noble Roman’s has begun concentrating on a take-and-bake concept similar to that of the industry-leading Papa Murphy’s chain. Pizzas in the Noble Roman’s Take-n-Bake P’ZA locations are made to order at room temperature, so customers can cook them at home.

In its latest earnings statement released March 12, Noble Roman’s said it has signed agreements for 55 stand-alone take-and-bake locations. The first of the 22 stand-alone locations operating opened in October 2012.

For the fourth quarter, the franchisor of Noble Roman's Pizza and Tuscano's Italian Style Subs said it earned $496,000, or 3 cents per share, compared with $566,000, or 3 cents per share, in the same period in 2012.

Quarterly revenue was flat, at $1.7 million.

For the entire year, Noble Roman’s earned $2.6 million, or 14 cents per share, compared with $2 million, or 10 cents per share, in 2012.

Annual revenue increased 9.1 percent, to $7.5 million.
 
Shares of Noble Roman’s are thinly traded on the over-the-counter exchange and were priced at $1.40 Thursday morning.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Location
    I do know that there is one at 10th/Girls School Rd. Would be nice if they made ordering online. Instead, I call and pickup. Only a couple of miles away. Prices are a little steep but when my herd is hungry, I go with the Colossial and it feeds all 6.
  • 49th & Penn
    There is a carryout store at 49th & Penn. Nothing like the old ones. I worked at 86th & Ditch in late 70's. This one has a few tables but carryout is best.
  • Noble Romans
    I do miss the Noble Roman's pizza. It was by far my favorite. There use to be one last standing at 56th and Georgetown, but, that is just too far to drive for us. I wonder if it is still there.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

ADVERTISEMENT