IBJNews

Northeastern Indiana auto parts maker laying off 175

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

An auto parts manufacturer in northeastern Indiana will lay off up to 175 employees for at least six months as the parent company consolidates operations and prepares the plant to make other products.

Michigan-based Ficosa North America Corp. notified the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, in a letter posted Thursday on the agency’s web site, that the layoffs at its Berne plant will begin on Sept. 6 and run through Nov. 7.

Ficosa said the continuing consolidation does not “alter the potential future” of the plant.

The plant south of Fort Wayne manufactures rear-view mirror systems. Ficosa is consolidating that work and expects to produce other products at the Berne plant.

Besides mirrors, Ficosa makes shift systems, fluid systems, parking brake systems, and air intake systems for U.S. car companies.

Founded in 1995, Ficosa North America is a subsidiary of Spain-based Ficosa.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • NAFTA
    This is another example of how N.A.F.T.A. works to raise unemployment figures. Why build a product in the U.S. using union labor and costs when you can build the same product outside the U.S. borders and ship it back to the U.S. at a fraction of the cost to build it in the U.S.? By creating N.A.F.T.A. it has been a lose / lose situation for the American laboror.
  • Where's "our man"
    I didn't read anything about Mitch being at this announcement. He alsways seems to be at new openings and hirings claiming how Indiana is moving ahead because of him, yet losses like this happen all the time. Maybe when he is done with his driveway through southern Indiana businesses will come back like promised?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT