IBJNews

Not-for-profits hang out consulting shingle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

 

Art at the Indianapolis International Airport The airport signed a contract for the Indianapolis Museum of Art to manage its collection. (IBJ File Photo)

Tight budgets are prompting some of the state’s largest not-for-profits to launch new businesses.

The Indianapolis Museum of Art started a consulting service around public art. The Kelley School of Business at Indiana University plans to market its students and faculty as paid consultants. And the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra is hunting for clients in need of outsourced administrative support.

“We’re just turning every stone to look at ways to generate income,” symphony CEO Simon Crookall said. He announced the ISO’s latest effort at the annual meeting in December, where the symphony’s board also learned of a near-record deficit, $2.7 million, in its latest fiscal year.

The latest ventures are in their infancy, but the museum’s new consulting arm, called IMA Art Services, has landed one client.

The Indianapolis Airport Authority this month signed a $100,000, one-year contract for the museum to manage its $4 million collection. The passenger terminal at Indianapolis International Airport, which opened in the fall of 2008, holds 40 pieces by 17 artists and six poets.

The IMA’s duties include maintenance and cleaning, developing “broad-based initiatives to generate more exposure” for the airport’s art, and creating guidelines for future commissions.

IMA Art Services is being modeled after the museum’s nearly 2-year-old IT consultancy, called IMA Labs, which does special projects for other museums. That business brought in about $190,000 in the fiscal year ended June 30 and is expected to generate $350,000 this year.

The museum is looking for ways to blunt the impact of heavy losses to its $300 million-plus endowment suffered during the financial crisis. The current budget is $21.2 million, down $7 million from two years ago.

The IMA’s foray into public art came after last summer’s opening of 100 Acres: The Virginia B. Fairbanks Art and Nature Park, spokeswoman Katie Zarich said.

“A number of city leaders looked to the IMA and realized there’s a certain amount of bench strength here at the museum to do large-scale public art projects they hadn’t realized before,” Zarich said.

Likewise, Kelley School of Business Dean Daniel Smith hopes to capitalize on IU’s many resources to build a consulting service that specializes in global business. He said it’s a natural extension of IU’s faculty and student talent, distance-meeting technology and contacts all over the world.

The consulting business, to be piloted next fall, would target small and medium-size firms. The fees would go into an endowment for student scholarships.

The Kelley School of Business markets itself as the most affordable highly ranked MBA program in the country, but even its annual cost has skyrocketed 44 percent since the 2007-2008 academic year, from $18,232 for Indiana residents to $26,182 this year.

Smith has talked publicly for the past couple of years about the need to stem tuition inflation, but he said Indiana’s move in late 2009 to cut state university funding pushed the Kelley School to act.

Smith outlined his plan in a recent guest column for The Economist magazine.

“What we’re witnessing is a whole era of rethinking what it means to be a public university,” Smith said.

The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra has spent the past two years cutting costs while trying to gather more donations and sell more tickets. Yet the orchestra still has 70 non-musician employees working in IT, finance, fundraising and marketing.

“Any big company that has an infrastructure to maintain would look at this,” Crookall said of his plan to farm out services. An ISO database manager, for example, could easily take on work for a small firm or not-for-profit, he said.

Crookall isn’t planning to advertise, but hopes existing business relationships lead to new clients.

The economy has sparked interest across the not-for-profit sector in finding new ways to generate revenue, said Leslie Lenkowsky, clinical professor of public affairs and philanthropic studies at Indiana University.

Rather than rely solely on donations or government contracts, he said, “It’s much better, if you have a service you think people will buy, to market it.”

Unwelcome competition?

Girl Scouts sell cookies. Goodwill runs thrift stores, and YMCAs offer fitness centers.

Yet charities’ business ventures often draw complaints from competitors, who don’t enjoy volunteer labor or tax-exemption.

Indianapolis-based Blackburn Architects led the airport’s public art program from its inception in 2004, and owner Alpha Blackburn had hoped to see her contract renewed after this year.

“I don’t fault any museum for trying to think creatively of ways to expand their revenue source,” said Blackburn, who is also a longtime supporter of the IMA. “I find myself objecting strenuously, however, as a businessperson to their, in essence, usurping opportunity by creating direct competition with small, for-profit businesses.”

Although the IMA’s curators are experts, Blackburn said choosing art for a public place, rather than museum property, is a different type of work.

“All kinds of people have to live with it for a long time,” she said. “It’s a whole different way of thinking about what’s appropriate.”

Business consultants might cringe at the thought of being undercut by IU students, but Smith argued that the Kelley School will fill an underserved niche. Small companies would pay a flat fee for six months to a year of work, which he said is longer than most consultants stay on the job. The fees would go to scholarships, as would a portion of revenue from business opportunities that result.

“There’s a lot of opportunity to help people out there,” Smith said. “There are literally thousands of midsize companies in Indiana alone.”

Smith emphasized that the proposed consultancy isn’t just to defray tuition. It’s a way to grow Indiana businesses and address “brain drain,” by helping students make connections that could keep them here after graduation.

“We see this as a way of helping the state,” Smith said.

Jim Ittenbach, president of Strategic Marketing and Research Inc. in Carmel, said colleges are becoming more assertive in a market that’s also full of displaced professionals working free-lance.

“The consulting world right now is kind of a cutthroat aggressive world in the first place,” Ittenbach said. “It does make it significantly more difficult to survive as a medium-size consulting company.”

Not all not-for-profits treat their in-house expertise as a source of revenue.

The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis, for example, has overseen the design of exhibits for a similar museum in Egypt. In exchange, a top Egyptian official ensured that a traveling King Tut exhibit stopped in Indianapolis last year.

The local museum didn’t profit from the show, but netted record attendance and a surge in memberships, CEO Jeffrey Patchen said.

If Children’s Museum staffers do outside work, Patchen said, “It needs to further the museum’s mission, and it needs to bring something to the museum that we wouldn’t have had otherwise.”

The IMA launched IMA Labs early last year in response to demand from other museums who were seeking help for special projects.

Robert Stein, deputy director for research, technology and engagement, said the IMA’s work on open-source platforms benefits the whole museum sector, which generally lacks budgets for high-quality software.

IMA Labs and IMA Art Services aren’t independent companies, but the staff members who work on their projects account for the time they spend on those ventures separately. Most of IMA Labs’ revenue was considered “unrelated business income,” and therefore taxable, Zarich said. The museum will work with its auditors to figure out whether revenue from Art Services is also taxable, she said.

Entering the market with a for-profit venture—which may ultimately fail—can provide good lessons for charities, Lenkowsky said.

“We talk a lot about accountability in the non-profit world,” he said. “If they don’t get the business, it should tell you something about what you’re doing and how the rest of the world perceives it.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Outside Revenue?
    I had a project that would have involved actually hiring the ISO for some commercial work; the recent downturn put the funding on hold, but I'm still planning...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT