IBJNews

Obamacare rebates total $22.6M in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana consumers are set to receive rebates that are 59 percent larger this year as Obamacare continues to force health insurers to refund premiums that exceed actual medical claims by more than 20 percent.

That’s opposite the trend nationally, where insurers successfully lowered their rebates by reducing or slowing the rise in premiums.

Rebates in Indiana will average $157 per family, based on premiums charged by insurers in 2012.

Those rebates reflect the $22.6 million that insurers charged above thresholds established by the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act. The law, better known as Obamacare, required that insurers spend on medical care no less than 80 percent of the premiums they charge to individuals and small businesses. The requirement is 85 percent for large employer customers.

Nationally, insurer rebates totaled $504 million, or an average of $98 per family, according to data released last week by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The Obama administration also claimed that the rule, known as a cap on medical-loss ratios, also led insurers to not enact $3.4 billion in premium hikes last year.

“This new standard is increasing transparency and accountability, promoting better business practices and competition among insurance companies, and ensuring consumers receive value for their premium dollars,” said Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, in a prepared statement.

It’s not clear why rebates spiked in Indiana. One challenge for insurers may have been the fact that medical spending is rising more slowly than it has in decades, even dipping in April for the first time since 1975.

A year ago, rebates in Indiana averaged $99 per family, whereas the national average was $151 per family.

Most of the rebates will flow to the small employers that sponsor health insurance for their workers. In the small group market, rebates will be paid on policies that cover 261,300 Hoosiers. The average rebate per family among small employers was $151.

It is up to employers how they pass on those savings to their workers.

Far fewer large employers saw a rebate. Large employer health plans that cover just 3,200 will receive a rebate. However, the rebate per family is large, averaging $638.

Last, 8,662 Hoosiers who are part of a health insurance plan purchased directly from an insurer—without any help from an employer—will also receive a rebate. Those refunds will average $147 per family.

Insurers can pay rebates in four ways: a rebate check in the mail, a reimbursement to the account used to buy insurance, a reduction in next year’s premium, or a refund to employers. All rebates are scheduled to be paid on Aug. 1.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ACA is working
    As noted in some other articles, ACA is also a driver of overall reduction in healthcare cost (i.e. forcing hospitals and insurers to reduce cost). Insuring everyone and bending the cost curve were the main reasons for the ACA. I knew it would work in the long-term, but I am glad to see some good results early on.
  • ACA is working?
    While I've read a lot of criticism and opinions about how costs of healthcare will skyrocket with ACA - mostly political rhetoric and baseless comments filled with conjecture and speculation - it seems that the facts like the premium costs published in California and these rebates intended to restrict cost management and profits to 20%, do not seem to be holding up those "sky is falling" theories. From a business perspective, ACA has always made sense. If more of my friends, family and fellow citizens can afford healthcare insurance, taxpayers will pay for fewer of those non-emergency emergency room runs. While it may not be a right, it should be an American privilege to just go to the doctor once in a while. Adding the uninsured population will lower cost through preventative care, and more drugs and services mean growth for medicine. Hope it all pans out that way.
  • Watch out
    The implosion of the world is going to happen any time now...right, guys???

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT