IBJNews

OrthoIndy looks to loopholes for growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

OrthoIndy, the physician practice that owns the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, was able to open a new outpatient facility this spring by working around growth restrictions in the 2010 health care reform law. But its choices for further growth are much starker—which is why it's lobbying to repeal that provision of the law.

The hospital continues to pay Krieg DeVault LLP attorneys Deborah Daniels and Tom New to lobby Congress to pass repeal legislation. The hospital spent $90,000 in 2009 and 2010 trying to prevent the provision from taking effect, according to data made available by the Center for Responsive Politics.

In the meantime, the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital is also developing contingency plans for how to grow in spite of the restrictions. To do so, the hospital would have to qualify for one of various exemptions under what is known as the Stark law.

“Not being able to expand certainly has us concerned,” said hospital CEO Jane Keller, adding, “In order to be a viable business, we need to have the ability to expand going forward.”

One exemption is for a publicly traded company, which Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital could become. But that’s an expensive proposition and might even require Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital to merge with other physician hospitals in order to reach the $75 million asset threshold required by the Stark law.

Another possible exemption would be to qualify as an academic center by operating several resident training programs. But that too is an expensive undertaking.

The Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital could transfer itself to an employee stock ownership plan. Or it could restrict its facility for use only by OrthoIndy physicians and then claim that all its procedures are part of its physicians' consultations with patients.

Dr. John Dietz, chairman of the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital, said each option would require many more lawyers and many more dollars to put into effect, compared with its current structure. He said the hospital doesn't have a favored option right now, but as the economy recovers and patient demand grows, a decision must be made within a few years.

"They're all about equally flawed as far as I can tell," Dietz said. "It's a choose your poison kind of a deal."

And a last resort would be to sell the operations, which Keller said the hospital and its physician owners do not want to do. OrthoIndy already sold a minority stake in the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital to St. Vincent Health in 2009.

OrthoIndy is the largest orthopaedics practice in central Indiana, with more than 70 specialists.

The 38-bed Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital currently operates at about 50-percent capacity, on average, but is at full capacity in the middle of each week, when most of its physicians schedule surgeries.

And with aging baby boomers needing more joint replacements, Keller is confident the hospital will run out of room in the not-too-distant future.

The hospital also operates two outpatient centers, one in Avon and one in Greenwood. The second center opened in March, even after the growth restrictions took effect, because the Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital was able to get rid of four beds at its facility in exchange for opening four operating rooms in the Greenwood facility.

But Keller said the hospital cannot afford to give up any more beds in the future.

“Orthopaedics is going to be in very high demand as the baby boomers continue to need our services,” she said. “We’re just hoping that we continue to meet their needs.”

 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT