Pence lets bill ending Energize Indiana become law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence will let a bill that eliminates an energy-conservation program become law without his signature, prompting harsh words from environmental leaders who opposed the bill.

Pence said he’ll look to lawmakers next year for help developing “a new energy-efficiency program for our state that will encourage conservation and promote a strong Indiana economy.”

And Pence said he’s asking state utility regulators to make recommendations for a new program that includes an opt-out for large electricity consumers.

“By reducing our need for electricity, we reduce our need to build expensive power plants at a cost to Hoosier ratepayers,” Pence said in a statement issued Thursday, the last day he could take action on the bill.

“For this reason, I believe that energy efficiency is an important part of our ‘all of the above’ energy strategy,” Pence said.

The change will eliminate a fee now added to the electric bills of all Hoosier households and businesses to pay for the conservation efforts that include weatherization and other programs.

Pence said maintaining the Energizing Indiana program – created by Gov. Mitch Daniels’ administration – is too expensive for Hoosiers and makes “Indiana less competitive by denying relief to large energy consumers.”

But the governor said he didn’t want to sign the bill into law either because it eliminates what he called a “worthwhile” energy-efficiency program.

“For that reason, I have declined to sign this bill and acknowledge that this bill will become law without my signature,” Pence said.

Pence's only other option would have been to veto the bill, an action that could be overturned in another vote by a simple majority of legislators. The bill passed the Senate 37-8 and the House 69-26.

The decision makes Pence the first governor in the country “to repeal a successful, ambitious and foresighted program aimed at significantly cutting energy bills for Hoosiers,” said Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council.

He accused Pence and lawmakers of a “rushed decision” to end the Energizing Indiana program.

“The governor’s decision needlessly creates instability in the energy-efficiency market, when a careful deliberation – before any radical shift in policy is made – was what was merited,” Kharbanda said.

Environmentalists say the Energizing Indiana program has created more than 1,500 jobs and served more than 200,000 Hoosier households and businesses. The Sierra  Club estimated the program resulted in $80 million in savings for utilities in 2012.

“It is critical that Gov. Pence and the Indiana General Assembly now follow through on their promise of creating an improved energy-efficiency program for Indiana,” said Jodi Perras, the Indiana representative for Sierra Club’ Beyond Coal Campaign, in a statement issued late Thursday.

“There’s no denying that hundreds of energy-efficiency workers will be out of a job next January when utilities cancel or scale back home-energy audits, appliance rebates and low-income home weatherization programs,” Perras said.

Critics of the Energizing Indiana program complained that it cost too much – especially for manufacturers and other big businesses – while providing few tangible benefits.

The bill’s author, Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis, originally sought to exempt businesses from paying the Energize Indiana fee. But the House amended the bill to eliminate the program.

Merritt has said the program costs too much with too little benefit. He said previously that the program had cost ratepayers $500 million since 2009 and would have cost as much as $1.9 billion more by 2019.


  • That makes sense...
    I believe that we were at a fundraising event for Trimedx Foundation, so the fact they got a kickback for signing up seems plausible.
  • The Truth
    Local nonprofits receive a $25 donation for every completed assessment they provide to Energizing Indiana. The largest Indianapolis participants in the program are the John Boner Center and the Community Action Coalition Educational Fund. Both organizations have contributed significantly to helping Indianapolis save money and energy. I can't speak on Sierra Club's participation in the program, but I can assure you it is nowhere near the participation of these two organizations.
    • wimping out
      I would feel better about this decision if Pence would have said yes or no. Instead, he made a career politician move and did not take a stand either way, simply letting this happen without having to voice a stand.
    • Energizing Indiana is worthless...
      They came out to our house and basically told us that nearly everything we were already doing was conserving energy. The only thing the guy did was stick something in our upstairs sink to reduce the water flow. And the big thing that he harped on my wife about when he was here was that we were using CFL light bulbs and that's usually what they end up replacing... that's all I use in the house, and he replaced them all anyway. What a waste of money! Well, now that the Feds have mandated that incandescent bulbs get phased out, that's all you can buy at the store anyway. Good riddance to a worthless program and too bad the governor didn't have a backbone to stand up against the special interests.
    • Hoosier State FIRST!
      wow remember this day, Indiana is the first state to cancel this type of program. Such a progressive state. Dig baby dig ....coal rains(acid) supreme.
    • Hmmm...
      Geez fellas, don't hurt yourself some real numbers wouldn't hurt, did you know that the sierra club gets 25 dineros for every household they sign-up. 500 million for 200,000 hoosier households and businesses sounds a bit costly but who really knows Lesley W. sure doesn't know but I expect more from youz guys.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

      2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

      3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

      4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

      5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.