IBJNews

Police called to control rowdy shoe shoppers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Unruly shoppers flocking to purchase the newest generation of Air Jordan basketball shoe threw objects at police at one Indianapolis mall and ripped a door off its hinges at another.

Hundreds lined up at Castleton Square and Lafayette Square malls to purchase the retro shoe that went on sale early Friday morning.

After midnight, some shoppers waiting outside Castleton Square began throwing objects at local police, who had been called to restore order, said Kendale Adams, spokesman for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department.

Police were called to Lafayette Square at about 6:30 a.m. to control a crowd of about 300 shoppers. A door at the mall was ripped off its hinges as the crowd surged into a mall entrance, Adams said.

Some stores at both malls were forced to close their doors shortly after opening at 7 a.m. due to the chaos caused by the shoppers.

Several calls to Finish Line stores at both malls were met with busy signals Friday morning. A company spokeswoman did not return phone calls seeking comment.

The classic-style shoe that retails for $180 is causing quite a stir nationally.

The Associated Press reported that police in Seattle used pepper spray to break up fights among shoe buyers who pushed and shoved outside an area mall.

At least four people were arrested in a mad dash by customers hoping to purchase a pair of the shoes at a suburban Atlanta shopping mall.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Planned scarcity works
    Amazing that people are so anxious to spend $180 on a product that likely costs less than $20 to make.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT