IBJNews

Q&A

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sam Gibbs is president of eHealth Government Solutions, part of California-based eHealthInsurance Services Inc. The company, founded in 1997, pioneered the sale of health insurance over the Internet. It now facilitates sales of health insurance products from more than 180 companies—for individuals and small businesses—in all 50 states. Gibbs spoke about the options for health insurance exchanges, including the state-based exchanges mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as private exchanges, such as eHealth’s and one being developed by Minnesota-based Bloom Health and Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc.
 
IBJ: What are the models that the state-based insurance exchanges could take?

A: California has a Medicaid enrollment process. So their vision of an exchange is sort of an expansion of a Medicaid enrollment process. But it’s mostly a big help center approach. That’s the one that’s the most people-centric. To contrast with that, there’s a couple of states, Pennsylvania and Virginia, they don’t want to be in the public-facing part of it at all. What they’re going to do is, they’re going to empower or sanction private companies to be the front-end exchange. They’ve recognized that states have never been in the e-commerce business. So they’re just going to outsource that to the private sector. Then most of the states—and Indiana is in this group—[say] they’ll create a separate not-for-profit and then bid it out to private companies.

IBJ: Do you expect private exchanges to be embraced by employers?

A: Small businesses, what’s happened over the past decade is that they’ve been priced out of it. So they’re constantly having to scale back benefits and trying to be creative. In fact, a lot of employers have dropped coverage over the last five years. The advantage of the [private] shop exchange is that it allows them to switch from a defined benefit to a defined contribution plan. It gives the employer absolute control over what they’re spending. And it allows the employee to actually pick the plan they want—based on where employees are in their life cycle. And they get to take it with them if they change companies. It’s a pretty big change. But my gut tells me it’s what the market wants.

IBJ: Since the defined contribution concept puts a lot more risk on employees, do you expect any employee pushback as employers switch to this model?

A: It’s so hard to say. If you understand the marketplace pretty well, you can get pretty excited about it. So I don’t know. If I just had to guess right now, I would suspect initially there’d be some resistance to it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT