RYAN: Recession could prompt tax reform

Earl Ryan
January 2, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Although the Great Recession appears to have bottomed out, state and local officials around the country are looking ahead with trepidation.

A new study by the National Conference of State Legislatures shows that states have narrowed a collective budget gap by $145.9 billion in the fiscal year that began July 1, only to be faced with another $28.2 billion gap for the remainder of the fiscal year. And fiscal 2011 and 2012 are equally bleak, with gaps between revenue and expenditures forecast at $54.2 billion and $68.8 billion, respectively.

In Indiana, a new forecast for the current biennium projects tax revenue to be $1.8 billion lower than expected when the budget was adopted in June.

The governor has taken steps to contain expenditures, recently announcing $300 million in cuts in K-12 education spending and reducing support for higher education by $150 million for the remainder of the biennium. The administration estimates that previous actions taken in November will save the state an additional $300 million to $400 million. Even these reductions, however, will not relieve the state of the necessity of tapping $1.3 billion in reserves that had been guarded until now.

Choices even harder than those already made are on the horizon.

Further budget cuts are always an option. But a point is reached at which functions of state government are compromised to such a degree that it makes fiscal sense to find new sources of revenue to prevent long-term damage to state programs and facilities, as well as its financial condition. Several states have chosen to do this, and the National Association of State Budget Officers estimates that, nationally, enacted state revenue increases for fiscal year 2010 will total $23.9 billion, by far the greatest increase in at least 30 years.

With each round of budget cutting, the pressure to find new revenue increases and, as the experience in other states indicates, the options are limited. Most of the significant recent increases have been either 1) increases in the rate of the sales tax or 2) increases in the top brackets of the personal income tax in states with graduated income tax rates. Corporate taxes have been increased in only a few states, while actually being reduced overall, as states are reluctant to jeopardize their ability to compete for business.

Despite the growth in the services sector, few states have chosen to broaden the base of the tax to include a large number of services, opting instead to increase the rate on the existing base. Those states that have tried to broaden the base in the last few years have had to brave fierce political headwinds to the point at which most recently enacted service taxes have been rescinded. Nevertheless, as a study by the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute concluded, expansion of the sales tax base to cover a broader array of services could permit a reduction in the rate of the tax to 6 percent, while at the same time helping to better align the Indiana tax system with the economy.

Another option available is that of a graduated income tax, in which rates increase as taxable income goes up. Indiana is one of only four states (of the 43 that levy personal income taxes) that have flat-rate income taxes. Graduated taxes tend to grow faster than flat-rate taxes over time and are viewed by many as a fairer way of distributing the tax burden, particularly in an era of increasing income disparities.

There will be no popular choices available in the months ahead, but if it is determined that new revenue is needed, policymakers would do well to consider not only the amount of revenue needed, but also whether this economic crisis might be used to improve the equity and responsiveness of the Indiana tax system.•


Ryan was the founding president of the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute and recently retired as president of the Citizen Research Council in Michigan. His report about the effect of extending the Indiana sales tax to services is at www.indianafiscal.org.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.