IBJOpinion

DINING: Salivating over Salvadoran cuisine on the westside

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

The flags waving over the humble 3 in 1 Restaurant (4810 W. 34th St., 543-7770) make clear that the trio referred to in the west-side eatery’s name are El Salvador, the United States and Mexico. But while U.S. and Mexican food are well-represented all over the city, it’s the El Salvadoran cuisine that drew us to this humble spot.

And it’s what will bring us back.

To be sure, there are not a lot of items on the menu. This is not one of those places where every possible combination of the same basic ingredients are organized into combos. Still, I’d suggest first-timers try the Combo ($5.79—including a drink).

Included is a sweet corn tamale, a pupusa (one bite of which may lead you to order more, at $1.50 each), and a steak taco. Many establishments make the mistake of complicating tamale’s corn-husk-encased cornmeal. When dipped in the homemade salsa, 3 in 1’s version melts in the mouth; not too spicy, not too sweet.

The pupusa (think a less-fully-stuffed gordita), consists of cheese, beans, pork and or chicken enveloped in a thick, soft, corn tortilla. Too often, corn tortillas are either a stiff shell or a crumbly circle. Here, the hand-tossed tortillas taste like someone’s El Salvadoran grandmother kneaded together the water and corn masa into these soft, doughy pouches.
 

Dining The combo at 3 in 1 Restaurant shows off a trio of deliciously simple items: a sweet corn tamale, a papusa and a steak taco. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

When our waitress asked if we wanted “everything” on the taco, I was braced for the salad-plus combo that “everything” usually means. But, instead, “everything” doesn’t mean the pile-on typical of American versions: The soft, fresh tortilla was simply topped with dark, flavorful steak, cilantro and onions, with lime to squeeze and tomatillo salsa for dipping.

We also ordered Flautas ($2.99 for three) at a price you can’t beat for packaged taquitos at a convenient store. Unlike those gut-killers, these crunchy, chicken-filled tubes were crisp without being greasy and covered with just the right amount of cheese to flavor without smothering. Our favorite, though, was the Rigua ($1.50), a sweet corn cake grilled in banana leaves, browning the top and bottom but leaving the rest golden. Despite sharing more than one ingredient with the tamales, the rigua had its own distinct taste with the corn flavor more prominent than in, say, corn bread but not so sweet that it felt like a dessert.

For drinks, you can go with the usual Coke products. But, instead, take a chance on a sweet bottle of Jarritos Tamarind soda ($1.25) or a glass of Horchata ($1.50)—the creamy rice drink that’s due for a popularity shot here in the States. No store-bought horchata powder mixing to a slush in a slurpee machine here.

There’s a small room for dining in and a lower level to pick up your takeout order. The décor at 3 in 1 is unpretentious-bordering-on-under-construction, the atmosphere is casual, and the service low-key. Getting your terrific lunch for two to exceed $15 will be a challenge. Who can ask for anything more?•

__________

Second in a month-long series of numeric restaurant reviews.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT