IBJNews

Scrap industry backs regulation of oft-stolen items

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Years into a scrap-metal boom that drives theft in cities across the country, the industry is backing Indiana legislation that could curb illegal activity involving two of the most frequently targeted items.

A Senate committee on Tuesday approved House Bill 1441, which would make it illegal to sell air-conditioner coils or catalytic converters without proof of ownership.

“We’re looking for a statewide solution to this,” said Ben Eisbart, vice president of compliance at Fort Wayne-based Steel Dynamics, the owner of OmniSource recycling. OmniSource has 15 scrap yards throughout Indiana, including four in Indianapolis.

OmniSource and the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries have supported similar legislation in other states, most recently Florida, Eisbart said.

Indianapolis officials who wanted to tighten the city’s scrap-metal ordinance were negotiating with recycling-industry lobbyists last year when both sides agreed to drop the effort in favor of a statewide approach. Reps. Jud McMillan, R-Brookville, and Justin Moed, D-Indianapolis, authored the bill.

The bill is tailored to affect street-level fencing operations. A person won’t be able to sell a catalytic converter without proof of ownership of the parent vehicle. Similarly, one won't be able to sell an air-conditioner coil without the original receipt from the unit, or the receipt from a replacement unit. Window air-conditioner units wouldn’t require documentation.

The proposed law is unlikely to inconvenience the average citizen, Eisbart said.

“How many people clean out their garage and have 20 catalytic converters?” he asked.

Depending on the amount of precious metal inside, a catalytic converter may net $35 to $65 at a scrap yard, said Joel Squadrito, director of security at Steel Dynamics. Air-conditioners are also an easy target, but their internal components are worth even less — $25 to $50, he said. OmniSource doesn't buy either item because of the association with theft, but there are dozens of scrap yards in the state that do. 

There are 33 scrap yards in Marion County, Deputy Prosecutor Jennifer Jones said, and when thieves can't unload their goods in Indianapolis, they often head to Edinburgh or Franklin.

The bill exempts business people who deal scrap in the normal course of work, including auto-parts salvagers. The state already regulates auto salvagers, Moed said. In general, he said, “we didn’t want to limit business-to-business transactions.”

State law already requires scrap yards to photograph the materials they buy and the seller, and retain the records.

Back in 2008, Indianapolis police received reports of about $1 million a month in stolen metals, and at least one catalytic converter was stolen a day, Jones said.

The problem hasn't abated, Indianapolis City-County Councilor Jeff Miller said. Attending a meeting in the Fountain Square neighborhood Monday, Miller said residents talked about the theft of both an air-conditioner coil and a catalytic converter. "So it really is real," he said.

Although some rural senators expressed concerns that the bill would make it difficult for farmers to scrap vehicles left on their property, the bill passed the committee on a 6-1 vote.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • This will really hurt me and others.
    For almost three years, I have handled the less valuable scrap from a local heating and air business. It takes a lot of work but I make enough each week to keep me afloat through college, along with a lot of other work. I take the metal that the business would lose money paying an employee to deal with and even sweep and clean the area for them. With this legislation, people like me who have dealt honestly with this kind of scrap will no longer be able to. Why would
  • Thank you for these effforts!
    As a commercial buidling owner, we've had $40,000 worth of air conditioners stolen twice so these crooks can get about $800 of copper to satisfy their drug habits. It is about time something is done about this as everyone seems to act like this is no big deal including the police since insurance replaces the units. It's not a victimless crime as we've spent $1000s trying to guard these units and had insurance rates increase almost 300% in 3 yrs. Nice to see someone in government finally doing something that helps rather than kicking the proverbial can down the road.
  • Scrap Yards
    Your 20 March Column reports on a problem that has plagued neighborhoods in this city for years. I'm glad the legislature is considering some action. One thing that needs to be added to the legislation that would make the job of law enforcement much easier. That is to require that the dealer photograph all items purchased. Everyone has a camera phone these days so it should not be a problem. We would only require them to keep the photographs for two weeks. A police officer looking for stolen goods would only have to go through the photos instead of searchying the entire premises.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT