IBJNews

Settlement struck in HHGregg dryer lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A settlement reached in a lawsuit brought by a group of consumers accusing appliance retailer HHGregg of improperly installing dryer vents is set to become final next month.

Federal court documents signifying that a preliminary deal has been struck between the two sides say attorneys could sign off on the settlement on March 18. The documents provide no details on the potential deal.

The suit, certified as a class action in U.S. District Court, alleges that Indianapolis-based retailer HHGregg improperly installed dryer vents in potentially thousands of consumers' homes, despite warnings that such vents could cause fires or other safety hazards.

An HHGregg spokeswoman said Wednesday morning that the company has no comment on the potential settlement.

The complaint includes consumers who bought dryers from HHGregg between May 2004 and March 2007.

The consumers claim the retailer installed plastic or foil “slinky” vents, even though many dryer manufacturers specifically call for heavy metal ducts to be used.

Filed in May 2008, the suit asks that HHGregg replace the improper vents and pay an unspecified amount in fees and damages.

Attorneys filed similar suits against home appliance retailers Lowe's Cos., Home Depot and Sears Holdings Corp. in each corporation's home state.

The suit in federal court in Indianapolis was brought by Ryan and Amanda Mack, who said in their complaint that they bought a $565 dryer at HHGregg’s 96th Street store in Indianapolis in 2007 and paid $59.99 for installation.

They later realized, however, that installers attached a flexible metal foil vent, even though the dryer included a sticker that explicitly stated, “Use a heavy metal vent ... do not use metal foil vents.”

By ignoring the warning, the suit says, the company voided manufacturers’ warranties and created a dangerous situation in which the dryers could catch on fire or cause other safety problems.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that clothes dryers account for 15,500 fires annually.

Plaintiffs in the class action are represented by local attorney Thomas A. Hargett.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • SETTLEMENT PAYMENTS
    When do the people who filed a claim against hhgreg be compensated for the foil vents they were given during their installation. Settlement ended in March its now July!
    Cleveland Ohio. Have not heard a response from your organization since the claim has been filed.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT